What's That Stench? It smells like Grade-A Honesty! The Place for Direct Opinions on Movies and TV Shows!
Sunday, January 30, 2011
It’s Academy Awards Nomination Assessment Time!!!
Opinions on this Year’s Oscar Nominations:
Article 1: The Good
1. I’m very happy that The King’s Speech has been nominated for several categories; including Best Picture. I thought that Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush and Helena Bonham Carter were all magnificent in their roles; and thus deserved to be nominated. Director Tom Hooper also got deservingly nominated for his pitch-perfect directing and I’m also very happy that screenwriter David Seidler got chosen as well for his great writing. Plus, The King’s Speech also succeeded in receiving nominations in other categories; including Best Cinematography, Costume Design, Original Score and more. In short terms, The King’s Speech deservingly got twelve nominations. I’m very happy about that.
2. I’m also very happy that Christian Bale got nominated for his phenomenal performance in Fighter. He really was the best actor in the film; more so than Mark Wahlberg (who didn’t get nominated at all). I’m actually split on the Best Supporting Actor Category; as I thought that Geoffrey Rush was top-notch as Duke Albert’s Speech Therapist Lionel Logue. So, if either Bale or Rush wins, I’ll be happy. I’m also happy that both Melissa Leo and Amy Adams got nominated in the Best Supporting Actress Category; though I think that Helena Bonham Carter was superior; and I hope she wins.
3. I’m glad that Jesse Eisenberg got nominated as well for his good performance in The Social Network. His emotionlessly deadpan act as Mark Zuckerberg was well-executed and I’m glad that he’s getting notices; though I really thought that Colin Firth gave a much grander performance as Duke Albert and I hope he is the victor in the Best Actor Category.
4. Even though I did not see Black Swan, I am very happy that Natalie Portman got nominated in the Best Actress Category. I have always been a fan of her and I hope she wins. However, I have this feeling that Annette Bening is going to win the award; since she has been nominated three times before and I think The Academy is going to give her the award.
5. Finally, even though it wasn’t my favorite film of the year, I’m glad that Inception got nominated in the Best Picture Category. Even though the storyline and the supporting cast’s character development needed to be strengthened, it was still a fun ride. However, I really hope that The King’s Speech wins the title of Best Picture as it was a grand film that was both historically accurate and uplifting.
Article 2. The Bad
1. How come Christopher Nolan wasn’t nominated in the Best Director Category for conducting all the effects, acting, and dazzling sequences in Inception? After all, James Cameron got nominated for directing Avatar last year. While I prefer Tom Hooper for his great directing of The King’s Speech; I do believe that Nolan should get recognized for his amazing feat.
2. As much as I love The King’s Speech and that I wish beyond wish that it wins Best Picture, I have this strange feeling that the Academy will pass over it in favor of The Kids Are Alright. Granted, I didn’t see the later, I have the feeling that the Annette Bening/ Julianne Moore headlined film will win; as it was heavily favored in the Comedy categories at the Golden Globes. As I didn’t see the film, everyone I spoke to who has seen it, says that it is not a comedy at all. No matter what, I do plan on seeing it before the ceremony on February 27th and then I will review it.
3. I thought Andrew Garfield would get nominated in the Best Supporting Actor Category for his performance in The Social Network. I thought that he provided a well-crafted performance as the moral Eduardo Saverin. His standing up to his so-called”best friend” Mark Zuckerberg, I thought, was deserving of being recognized by The Academy. Though, I will say that Christian Bale and Geoffrey Rush were infinitely times greater than Garfield in their respective films. Despite this, I really do wish that Andrew Garfield was given some more recognition for his performance.
Which Now Brings Me to My Third and Final Article
Article 3: My Wishful Winners of The Main 5 Categories for The 83rd Annual Academy Awards
Best Supporting Actress: Helena Bonham Carter (The King’s Speech)
Best Supporting Actor: Either Christian Bale (The Fighter) or Geoffrey Rush (The King’s Speech)
Best Actress: Natalie Portman (Black Swan) (Though I haven’t seen it yet)
Best Actor: Colin Firth (The King’s Speech)
Best Movie: The King’s Speech
So those are my thoughts on this year’s Academy Awards nominations. In the weeks leading up to the ceremony, I will try to see and review nominated films; including The Kids are Alright, True Grit, and Best Animated Film Nominee Toy Story 3 (I really want to see this movie!!!!!) Until then happy reading and stay tuned for more Nater-Tainment!!!
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Notice About My Next Post!
Monday, January 24, 2011
Notice: The Academy Awards Nominations are Tomorrow!!!
Sunday, January 23, 2011
And Now, What You’ve Been Waiting For


8. "Morning Glory"

Image taken from
http://watchmorningglory.net/images/watch-morning-glory-online.jpg
Harrison Ford is a Hollywood legend! He has played Han Solo, Indiana Jones and several other great roles. But this year, Ford takes part in a lighthearted comedy as veteran and hardened news anchor Mike Pomeroy. Rachel MacAdams plays the role of the lead protagonist Becky Fuller; an eager new producer for failing morning news program “DayBreak”. After she fires a co-anchor belonging to anchor lady colleen Peck, played by Diane Keaton, MacAdams’ Fuller brings in the embittered Pomeroy; and immediately the sparks fly between the two anchors. The three actors provide great chemistry and the whole movie is fun to watch; especially as MacAdams’ Fuller makes the program feature many fun features to make the program succeed; one such example to improve ratings is for Keaton’s Peck to rap with 50 Cent. And Ford’s performance as the hardened Pomeroy is top-notch and amusing. However, like the previously mentioned films, there are parts that feel rushed; especially the ending. Otherwise, I am happy to say that Morning Glory is an amusingly warm movie and my eighth favorite film of the year.

Image taken from http://www.krackblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/the-social-network-movie-photo.jpg

Image taken from http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/The-Fighter-Photo.jpg

Image taken from http://images.starpulse.com/news/bloggers/6/blog_images/red-bruce-willis.jpg

Image taken from http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/9/20/1284980597077/the-town-ben-affleck-006.jpg

Image taken from http://www.accesshollywood.com/content/images/124/415x0/124406_joseph-gordon-levitt-and-leonardo-dicaprio-make-their-move-in-inception.jpg
Image taken from http://bluraymedia.ign.com/bluray/image/article/114/1141503/easy-a-20101222032230090.jpg
Image taken from http://jabcatmovies.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/the-kings-speech.jpg
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Battle of the Films: The King’s Speech vs. The Social Network
The King’s Speech is More Inspiring than The Social Network; which Makes it the Better Film
In Fincher’s landmark cinematic work The Social Network, we are introduced to the-Harvard-college-student-now-billionaire Mark Zuckerberg; portrayed with such caustic indifference by Jesse Eisenberg. Set in 2003 and following a not-so-emotional break-up, Zuckerberg originally creates a new website which allows male students to compare their fellow female students’ good looks. However, he hijacks students’ personal information and getting his friend Eduardo Saverin, played by Andrew Garfield, to supply him with the means to do so. His work catches the eyes of twin brothers Cameron and Tyler Winkelvoss, both played by Arnie Hammer, as well as their colleague Divya Narendra, portrayed by Max Minghella; who enlist their fellow student to help them create a new website called The Harvard Collection; an online communication service which would be exclusively available to the student body. Unfortunately for the twins, mark tells the idea to Eduardo, calling it “Thefacebook.” He then has his friend contribute money required to launch the site and spread it throughout the student body. When the twins discover what has occurred, Cameron refuses to sue Mark despite his brother and colleague’s urges. Eventually, Mark and Eduardo meet up with Napster founder Sean Parker, played with great dynamic egotism by Justin Timberlake, who convinces him to drop the “the” from “Thefacebook” as well as how to make money off the website; and eventually, despite Eduardo’s distrust of Sean, Facebook is hugely successful. As events proceed, Eduardo is finally squeezed out of the business by his so-called “friend” Mark. And as all the disloyalty is taking place, the film continuously cuts to Mark being in the middle of two court cases. These affairs end up being between the twins, who both ultimately agreed to go to court; and Eduardo, who wants compensation for being cut off. Thus, as a result of all the acts of fickleness and deceitfulness committed by Mark Zuckerberg, we can clearly see how The Social Network ends up showing depicting a relationship turning sour. This completely differs from The King’s Speech; which featured a more compassionate rapport between two mature adults.
]

Image taken from http://www.fasthorseinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/The-Social-Network.jpg
An interesting distinction between The King’s Speech and The Social Network is the depiction of their respective main protagonists. In Hooper’s historic composition, Colin Firth plays Duke Albert; the eventual-King-of-England; a role performed so majestically, that it earned him a Golden Globe. He is a benevolent husband and father cursed with a fear of eventually assuming the royal throne; which has caused him to develop an unfortunate and serious stammer, The then-Duke has such difficulty speaking; so much so that it is hard for him to tell his precious daughters a bedtime story. But, while Firth’s Albert is a good man plagued with a significant speech impediment, The Social Network’s Jesse Eisenberg doesn’t have any health impediments; but he does suffer from an ego and a significant case of apathy. When we meet Mark Zuckerberg at the start of the film, he is bickering with his then-girlfriend at a bar over a series of topics; which eventually leads him to break up with her with no apparent thought of her emotions. And, when dealing with the twins, he doesn’t show any signs of cooperation as he takes their ideas and incorporates them into his own schemes. This is nothing like Duke Albert; who is truly a more sympathetic and caring person.
Another fascinating difference that distinguishes The King’s Speech as the more positive film is that it centers on a meaningful and strong friendship; as evident by the engaging relationship between Firth’s Albert and Geoffrey Rush’s Lionel Logue. When first meeting his new speech therapist, the then-Duke refuses to have assistance from a common person; especially when he is told to stop smoking. But, as The King’s Speech progresses, it is enjoyable to watch the pair partake in their sessions as Rush’s Logue comes up with fascinating exercises to help the troubled Duke loosen up. And when he therapist helps divulge the psychological root of his disability, you can see how the pair have made their relationship become more personable and heartwarming; especially when the film reaches its pivotal climax. This is quite fascinating to keep in mind when comparing the two films; as it is very intriguing that in the Social Network, both boys were friends at the start of the film. However, once Eisenberg’s Mark Zuckerberg starts to implement his goals, his relationship with Andrew Garfield’s Eduardo Saverin begins to crumble drastically. This is evident as he manipulates his companion into giving him money whenever he requires assistance; all the while casually referring to him as Co-Founder of Facebook. And when the film reaches its culmination, their friendship is diminished as Garfield’s Saverin no longer has any financial stake in Facebook and squeezed out of his position in the company. Therefore, the entire torrid relationship between Mark and Eduardo has nothing on the meaningful and touching bond highlighted in The King’s Speech; thus making Duke Albert and Lionel Logue extremely more pleasant figures than those featured in The Social Network.
Image taken from http://nonsensefilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/the-social-network-movie-review1.jpg
While both films differ in tone and human nature, they do share one similar aspect: high-quality acting. While veteran performers Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, and Helena Bonham Carter light up The King’s Speech with their years of experience; the young core cast of The Social Network, consisting of Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, and Justin Timberlake, speak every line with intense energy and act with theatrical energy. As Zuckerberg, Eisenberg remains so entirely expressionless; that even during his most dramatic scenes, his presence is still subdued and lacking of human emotion. His detached presentation makes you completely forget his role in 2009’s horror-comedy Zombieland; in which he plays a cowardly survivor in search of safety away from the undead. And Garfield, who will be seen on movie screens next year as Spiderman, works quite well as the unfortunate Eduardo Saverin; who constantly gets persuaded to finance Mark and his plans. Justin Timberlake gives a great performance as well as the over-confident and gaudy Sean Parker; thus putting aside his image as a musician and showing flair for acting. Thus, all three actors prove that, despite the dismal manner of the film, they are skilled at portraying key figures; just as the elegant core performers of The King’s Speech.
Nevertheless, I do think that The King’s Speech holds a higher candle to Fincher’s drama about the creation of Facebook. While the later is designed to depict the origin of one of the Internet’s most popular websites, I believe that writer David Seidler’s enriching story; combined with Hooper’s grand directing as well as the core actors’ first-class performances deliver a greater lesson in humanity. And, while I do, in fact, feel that The Social Network is worth watching, I believe that The King’s Speech is a film that is worth remembering for years to come
(Image taken from http://www.awardsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/kings-speech-5.jpg0
E-mail me at thatsnatertainment@gmx.com
