Well the nominations for the 83rd Annual Academy Awards have been officially announced. And, instead of just writing an article on the subject at hand, I thought I would separate my thoughts into different categories. And so, with no further ado, let me begin my:
Opinions on this Year’s Oscar Nominations:
Article 1: The Good
1. I’m very happy that The King’s Speech has been nominated for several categories; including Best Picture. I thought that Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush and Helena Bonham Carter were all magnificent in their roles; and thus deserved to be nominated. Director Tom Hooper also got deservingly nominated for his pitch-perfect directing and I’m also very happy that screenwriter David Seidler got chosen as well for his great writing. Plus, The King’s Speech also succeeded in receiving nominations in other categories; including Best Cinematography, Costume Design, Original Score and more. In short terms, The King’s Speech deservingly got twelve nominations. I’m very happy about that.
2. I’m also very happy that Christian Bale got nominated for his phenomenal performance in Fighter. He really was the best actor in the film; more so than Mark Wahlberg (who didn’t get nominated at all). I’m actually split on the Best Supporting Actor Category; as I thought that Geoffrey Rush was top-notch as Duke Albert’s Speech Therapist Lionel Logue. So, if either Bale or Rush wins, I’ll be happy. I’m also happy that both Melissa Leo and Amy Adams got nominated in the Best Supporting Actress Category; though I think that Helena Bonham Carter was superior; and I hope she wins.
3. I’m glad that Jesse Eisenberg got nominated as well for his good performance in The Social Network. His emotionlessly deadpan act as Mark Zuckerberg was well-executed and I’m glad that he’s getting notices; though I really thought that Colin Firth gave a much grander performance as Duke Albert and I hope he is the victor in the Best Actor Category.
4. Even though I did not see Black Swan, I am very happy that Natalie Portman got nominated in the Best Actress Category. I have always been a fan of her and I hope she wins. However, I have this feeling that Annette Bening is going to win the award; since she has been nominated three times before and I think The Academy is going to give her the award.
5. Finally, even though it wasn’t my favorite film of the year, I’m glad that Inception got nominated in the Best Picture Category. Even though the storyline and the supporting cast’s character development needed to be strengthened, it was still a fun ride. However, I really hope that The King’s Speech wins the title of Best Picture as it was a grand film that was both historically accurate and uplifting.
Article 2. The Bad
1. How come Christopher Nolan wasn’t nominated in the Best Director Category for conducting all the effects, acting, and dazzling sequences in Inception? After all, James Cameron got nominated for directing Avatar last year. While I prefer Tom Hooper for his great directing of The King’s Speech; I do believe that Nolan should get recognized for his amazing feat.
2. As much as I love The King’s Speech and that I wish beyond wish that it wins Best Picture, I have this strange feeling that the Academy will pass over it in favor of The Kids Are Alright. Granted, I didn’t see the later, I have the feeling that the Annette Bening/ Julianne Moore headlined film will win; as it was heavily favored in the Comedy categories at the Golden Globes. As I didn’t see the film, everyone I spoke to who has seen it, says that it is not a comedy at all. No matter what, I do plan on seeing it before the ceremony on February 27th and then I will review it.
3. I thought Andrew Garfield would get nominated in the Best Supporting Actor Category for his performance in The Social Network. I thought that he provided a well-crafted performance as the moral Eduardo Saverin. His standing up to his so-called”best friend” Mark Zuckerberg, I thought, was deserving of being recognized by The Academy. Though, I will say that Christian Bale and Geoffrey Rush were infinitely times greater than Garfield in their respective films. Despite this, I really do wish that Andrew Garfield was given some more recognition for his performance.
Which Now Brings Me to My Third and Final Article
Article 3: My Wishful Winners of The Main 5 Categories for The 83rd Annual Academy Awards
Best Supporting Actress: Helena Bonham Carter (The King’s Speech)
Best Supporting Actor: Either Christian Bale (The Fighter) or Geoffrey Rush (The King’s Speech)
Best Actress: Natalie Portman (Black Swan) (Though I haven’t seen it yet)
Best Actor: Colin Firth (The King’s Speech)
Best Movie: The King’s Speech
So those are my thoughts on this year’s Academy Awards nominations. In the weeks leading up to the ceremony, I will try to see and review nominated films; including The Kids are Alright, True Grit, and Best Animated Film Nominee Toy Story 3 (I really want to see this movie!!!!!) Until then happy reading and stay tuned for more Nater-Tainment!!!
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Notice About My Next Post!
As you all know, the Nominations for the 83rd Academy Awards have been announced! If you do not know what has been nominated, you can find out the information at http://www.imdb.com/features/oscars/2011/nominations. By early next week, I will have all my thoughts regarding who has been nomated written on my blog. So stay tuned and here's to a great Oscar Season!
Monday, January 24, 2011
Notice: The Academy Awards Nominations are Tomorrow!!!
Just to let you all know, the Academy Awards Nominations are announced tomorrow! So, in the weeks leading up to the ceremony on February 27, I will review some nominated films once I have seen them. So keep your eyes peeled for tomorrow. Awards season is heating up!!!
Sunday, January 23, 2011
And Now, What You’ve Been Waiting For
Welcome to what I like to call the list of My Top Ten Films of 2010! I saw many films this past year and I have selected my favorites. When making this list, I have picked out ten movies that feature great stories and standout performances. I am really excited to share with you my list so let’s get this started!
8. "Morning Glory"
Image taken from
http://watchmorningglory.net/images/watch-morning-glory-online.jpg
Harrison Ford is a Hollywood legend! He has played Han Solo, Indiana Jones and several other great roles. But this year, Ford takes part in a lighthearted comedy as veteran and hardened news anchor Mike Pomeroy. Rachel MacAdams plays the role of the lead protagonist Becky Fuller; an eager new producer for failing morning news program “DayBreak”. After she fires a co-anchor belonging to anchor lady colleen Peck, played by Diane Keaton, MacAdams’ Fuller brings in the embittered Pomeroy; and immediately the sparks fly between the two anchors. The three actors provide great chemistry and the whole movie is fun to watch; especially as MacAdams’ Fuller makes the program feature many fun features to make the program succeed; one such example to improve ratings is for Keaton’s Peck to rap with 50 Cent. And Ford’s performance as the hardened Pomeroy is top-notch and amusing. However, like the previously mentioned films, there are parts that feel rushed; especially the ending. Otherwise, I am happy to say that Morning Glory is an amusingly warm movie and my eighth favorite film of the year.
Image taken from http://www.krackblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/the-social-network-movie-photo.jpg
Image taken from http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/The-Fighter-Photo.jpg
Image taken from http://images.starpulse.com/news/bloggers/6/blog_images/red-bruce-willis.jpg
Image taken from http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/9/20/1284980597077/the-town-ben-affleck-006.jpg
Image taken from http://www.accesshollywood.com/content/images/124/415x0/124406_joseph-gordon-levitt-and-leonardo-dicaprio-make-their-move-in-inception.jpg
Image taken from http://bluraymedia.ign.com/bluray/image/article/114/1141503/easy-a-20101222032230090.jpg
Image taken from http://jabcatmovies.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/the-kings-speech.jpg
My Top 10 Films of 2010
10. "Iron Man 2"
Image taken from http://blog.media-freaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/free-hidden-object-games-2.jpg
Robert Downey Jr. returned this past summer with an explosive sequel to his 2008 blockbuster. Every scene featured the great actor deliver great lines and even more action. His performance as Tony Stark/Iron Man was just as beautifully over-confident as in the first film and he never once loses the audience’s attention as he performs one death-defying feat after another. Furthermore, Mickey Rourke plays the role of the film’s villain Ivan Vanko with great fiendish flair and Sam Rockwell makes a great addition as Stark’s high-energy business rival Justin Hammer. Gwyneth Paltrow makes her graceful return as Stark’s right-hand lady Pepper Potts; and even though Terrence Howard does not return as Lt. Col. James ‘Rhodey’ Rhodes, Don Cheadle makes a great replacement as he provides a great stint as the straight man to Downey’s Stark’s reckless but endearing behavior. Throw in Scarlett Johansson as the stylish Black Widow and Samuel L. Jackson as the no-nonsense Nick Fury, and you have a fun-filled action-packed adventure. Despite all the amusement, I did feel that the film was rushed to fill its desired length and the final battle could have been given much better treatment; plus I did feel that there was no concrete plot as there was so much going on at once. Otherwise, Iron Man 2 is the perfect film to start my year-end countdown.
9. "Date Night"
Image taken from http://www.bite.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/DateNight6-14-09AH.jpg
When you take the stars of the hit NBC sitcoms "The Office" and "30 Rock", you would expect an instant comedy classic, right. Well, in "Date Night", comedy superstars Steve Carell and Tina Fey do not disappoint as they star in perhaps the best screwball comedy of the past year. As jaded married couple Phil and Claire Foster, the pair assume fake identities in order to dine at a fancy new restaurant in New York City for their once-a-week night out, However, their false personas get them into trouble and their affair turns into a crazy and all-night adventure. And Carell and Fey both give comic performances that do not lull at any point. Throw in funny characters played by James Franco, Mila Kunis, and a surprisingly funny Mark Wahlberg, you get a fun ride. I do feel, however, that certain aspects of the film are indeed rushed; but that is the only downside. Truly "Date Night" is a great comedy and it makes a good fit at number nine on my countdown.
8. "Morning Glory"
Image taken from
http://watchmorningglory.net/images/watch-morning-glory-online.jpg
Harrison Ford is a Hollywood legend! He has played Han Solo, Indiana Jones and several other great roles. But this year, Ford takes part in a lighthearted comedy as veteran and hardened news anchor Mike Pomeroy. Rachel MacAdams plays the role of the lead protagonist Becky Fuller; an eager new producer for failing morning news program “DayBreak”. After she fires a co-anchor belonging to anchor lady colleen Peck, played by Diane Keaton, MacAdams’ Fuller brings in the embittered Pomeroy; and immediately the sparks fly between the two anchors. The three actors provide great chemistry and the whole movie is fun to watch; especially as MacAdams’ Fuller makes the program feature many fun features to make the program succeed; one such example to improve ratings is for Keaton’s Peck to rap with 50 Cent. And Ford’s performance as the hardened Pomeroy is top-notch and amusing. However, like the previously mentioned films, there are parts that feel rushed; especially the ending. Otherwise, I am happy to say that Morning Glory is an amusingly warm movie and my eighth favorite film of the year.
7. "The Social Network"
Image taken from http://www.krackblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/the-social-network-movie-photo.jpg
I had a hard time figuring out the rating for this movie. Granted, I like good drama and director David Fincher and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin created a gripping film depicting the origin of Facebook. And core performs Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, and Justin Timberlake did a great job handling the stern material. I guess that my main concern with the film is that was very dark in its entirety and its main character is completely unlikable. However, I was very impressed with Jesse Eisenberg’s performance as Mark Zuckerberg; who he plays with such extreme emotionless indifference that you completely forget the completely cowardly and lonely character he played in "Zombieland". And based on his feat as the ethical Eduardo Saverin, I am looking forward to see Garfield play Spiderman on the big screen next year; though I wished that he was used more as his performance was overshadowed by Eisenberg’s. And Justin Timberlake performs greatly as the over-confident Sean Parker. Henceforth, though I did like the movie as a whole, "The Social Network" is my seventh favorite film of 2010.
6. "The Fighter"
Image taken from http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/The-Fighter-Photo.jpg
As I am not a big fan of Mark Wahlberg, there is a serious reason why this movie is on my list. And that reason pertains to the following four words: Christian Bale’s expressive presentation. When playing former boxing champion Dicky Ekland, Bale gives the film’s best performance; as the audience sees him try to do whatever he can to help Wahlberg’s Micky Ward become a victor in the ring; just like himself. However, the older brother suffers from a serious drug habit as well as an overstuffed ego. And Bale truly nailed his performance by going above and beyond to make sure that he completely resembled the person he was portraying by losing a lot of weight and exactly mimicking Ekland’s physical mannerisms; as evident by footage of the real-life brothers that played during the film’s credits. Furthermore, supporting actresses Melissa Leo and Amy Adams gave stirring performances as well; thus making Wahlberg’s starring role seem more supporting in nature. In other words, Mark Wahlberg’s acting was what brought down the film. But that doesn’t surprise me as the only time I was happy with the actor this year was his stint in "Date Night". But, thanks to the amazing Christian Bale, "The Fighter" takes its rightful place as my sixth favorite film of 2010.
5. "RED"
Image taken from http://images.starpulse.com/news/bloggers/6/blog_images/red-bruce-willis.jpg
As we enter the top five films on my list, we come to my favorite action comedy of the year. Bruce Willis once again plays a grizzled auth authority figure out on a quest to protect the woman he loves; only this time he plays a retired former government agent who longs to fight the bad guys again. But while we have seen him play the same type of role he frequently assumes, I believe that it is the supporting cast that provides the most memorable moments to this fun-filled and action-packed ride. John Malcovich absolutely steals the movie as his overly-paranoid character Marvin Boggs and Helen Mirren provides a tough yet graceful performance as her character Victoria; a former agent who is skilled in the art of firing a sniper. Throw in Morgan Freeman as the wise former agent Joe Matheson as well as Richard Dreyfus, who plays a role that completely differs from those in the past, and you’ve got an original action comedy with many twists and turns. I will say that Mary-Louise Parker provided nothing really memorable as Willis’ character’s love interest and the fact that certain elements of the story were questionable. Henceforth, "RED" is an original comedy that places well as my fifth favorite film of 2010
4. The Town
Image taken from http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/9/20/1284980597077/the-town-ben-affleck-006.jpg
Ben Affleck is back! Three years after helming "Gone Baby Gone", Affleck presents his second stint at directing; this time he stars in what is the ultimate heist movie. Affleck gives a good performance as Doug MacRay; the leader of four friends who make up a gang of thieves who commit elaborate acts of robbery in Massachusetts. However, he falls in love with bank manager Claire Keesey; whom he kidnaps; but lets her go as he starts to fall in love her. He then forms a relationship with her; all the while trying not to give away his identity as her kidnapper as he covered her eyes during her abduction. As director, Affleck gets a great performance out of himself and Renner performs well as MacRay’s best friend and fellow thief James “Jen” Coughlin. Plus Jon Hamm is also grand as FBI Agent Frawley; who attempts to apprehend MacRay and his gang. While the movie is full of excitement I believe that all car chases and gunfights come off as generic and some additional action scenes are a tad unbelievable. Nevertheless, Affleck is my official Comeback star of 2010; and "The Town" is my official fourth favorite film of the past year.
And now, we have reached my top three favorite films of the year. These are the cream of the crop and I’m very excited to present them to you. And coming in at number three, I think that a lot of you are going to be completely dazed; just as much as the film made you this past summer!
3. "Inception"
Image taken from http://www.accesshollywood.com/content/images/124/415x0/124406_joseph-gordon-levitt-and-leonardo-dicaprio-make-their-move-in-inception.jpg
Are you shocked that this mega blockbuster is not number one on my list? Well, you better believe it. Granted, Director Christopher Nolan is amazing; as he was able to orchestrate all the astonishing visual effects and shocking stunts performed in the movie. Plus, Leonardo DiCaprio was terrific as main character Dom Cobb; a master thief who can pinch items from the unconscious. As he and his teammates try to accomplish the feat of placing a thought in the subconscious, he has to deal with his troubled past and confront his problems head-on. But besides Nolan’s master craftwork and DiCaprio’s ability to portray an intense yet approachable central character, I feel that the film could have better character development pertaining to those being portrayed by his co-stars; particularly those played by Joseph Gordan-Levitt and Ellen Page. Plus while the idea of going deeper and deeper into the subconscious is an intriguing concept I feel that the actual story could have been made stronger. Finally, you have to admit the film could have been made a little bit shorter; as it was almost three hours in length. Nevertheless, Inception is an amazing visual work to be watched on the big screen and Nolan is a great director. Thus Inception takes it rightful place as my third favorite movie of the past year and my preferred action movie of 2010!
And coming in as the runner-up on my year-end countdown is…..
2. "Easy A"
Image taken from http://bluraymedia.ign.com/bluray/image/article/114/1141503/easy-a-20101222032230090.jpg
I know what you are all probably thinking: a teen comedy over Inception? Well, let me say that in addition to an engaging screenplay and a great ensemble of performers; Easy A features my Breakout Performer of 2010: Emma Stone. After appearing in supporting roles in comedies such as "Superbad" and "Zombieland", Stone takes center stage as the film’s protagonist Olive; a high school l who must deal with the heavy consequences after she tells a white lie in order to get out of spending the weekend with her friend Rhiannon; played by Alyson Michalka. And, ater she builds on to the lie by saying that she lost her virginity to a college student, the heavy gossip commences; and gives a great and honest performance throughout the film. She also proves that she can perform acts of verbal and physical humor; as well as demonstrating her gift for perfect comedic timing. And when the film takes a serious turn, Emma Stone gives an emotional performance that is completely believable and full of heart. In fact, her entire presentation as an actress is genuine and she remains down-to-earth as the movie’s official lead. I am really looking forward to seeing Emma Stone in more films and it is because of her memorable performance as Olive that has made "Easy A" my choice comedy of the past year and my second favorite film of 2010.
Which brings me to my Number One Movie of 2010. Can I have a drum roll please?
My favorite movie of 2010 is…..
1. "The King’s Speech"!!!!!!!
Image taken from http://jabcatmovies.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/the-kings-speech.jpg
What can I say about the most inspirational and uplifting film of 2010? Set in England in the years leading up to the country’s involvement in World War II, Colin Firth gives a tremendous performance as Duke Albert; the eventual King who suffers from an unfortunate stammer and a tremendous fear of inheriting the royal throne. To help overcome his handicap, his loving and devoted wife Elizabeth played with grand elegance by Helena Bonham Carter, reaches out to therapist Lionel Logue; played with such dignity by Geoffrey Rush. What follows is a great interplay between actors Firth and Rush; as their on-screen personas go through many sessions and exercises to better help the troubled Duke deal with his impalement and raise his confidence as he ultimately inherits the role of being King of England. And it’s great to see that while The King’s Speech is technically a drama; it also contains some humorous interactions between Firth’s Duke Albert and Rush’s Lionel Logue. In short "The King’s Speech" as it all!
And, speaking as a person with a disability, this movie truly speaks to me. As Duke Albert always had the love of his wife and daughters, my family has given me all the confidence to live on my own since 2007. Henceforth I am so grateful for everything they have done for me. I also want to thank my family for inspiring me and encouraging me to create this blog. And, as Duke Albert had the friendship of Lionel Logue, I am so grateful for all my friends that have always helped me throughout the years by helping me with tasks that I have difficulty with; such as helping me run errands. Also, my friends are always there to speak with me whenever I want to talk or hang out. So as Duke Albert was surrounded by the love and support from his wife, daughters, and his friend Lionel Logue; I am very lucky to be surrounded by my wonderful family and friends. Thus, because I can strongly relate to Colin Firth’s Duke Albert, "The King’s Speech" is not only my favorite drama of the past year it is my Favorite Film of 2010!!!!
So there you have it: My Top 10 Movies of 2010!
What a list! I am looking forward to seeing more movies and reviewing the heck out of them all throughout the year. Thank you so much for reading my list and everything on my blog and I’m looking forward to a great 2011! Thank you again for everything and here’s to a lot more Nater-Tainment!!!!
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Battle of the Films: The King’s Speech vs. The Social Network
Well, the 68th Golden Globes have come and gone and there have been many memorable events that took place during the esteemed event. The Fighter’s supporting actors Melissa Leo and Christian Bale received their respective awards. Also, Robert DeNiro was honored with the prestigious Cecil B. DeMille Award. Host Ricky Gervais even made headlines due to his humorous yet controversial stand-up material. But, the big story of the night was David Fincher’s gripping oeuvre The Social Network winning the honor of winning the title of Best Drama over its fellow nominees; which included Director Tom Hooper’s moving and graceful masterwork The King’s Speech. This completely struck me; since the manner of The Social Network’s was darker in nature. Henceforth, I say with complete seriousness:
The King’s Speech is More Inspiring than The Social Network; which Makes it the Better Film
In Fincher’s landmark cinematic work The Social Network, we are introduced to the-Harvard-college-student-now-billionaire Mark Zuckerberg; portrayed with such caustic indifference by Jesse Eisenberg. Set in 2003 and following a not-so-emotional break-up, Zuckerberg originally creates a new website which allows male students to compare their fellow female students’ good looks. However, he hijacks students’ personal information and getting his friend Eduardo Saverin, played by Andrew Garfield, to supply him with the means to do so. His work catches the eyes of twin brothers Cameron and Tyler Winkelvoss, both played by Arnie Hammer, as well as their colleague Divya Narendra, portrayed by Max Minghella; who enlist their fellow student to help them create a new website called The Harvard Collection; an online communication service which would be exclusively available to the student body. Unfortunately for the twins, mark tells the idea to Eduardo, calling it “Thefacebook.” He then has his friend contribute money required to launch the site and spread it throughout the student body. When the twins discover what has occurred, Cameron refuses to sue Mark despite his brother and colleague’s urges. Eventually, Mark and Eduardo meet up with Napster founder Sean Parker, played with great dynamic egotism by Justin Timberlake, who convinces him to drop the “the” from “Thefacebook” as well as how to make money off the website; and eventually, despite Eduardo’s distrust of Sean, Facebook is hugely successful. As events proceed, Eduardo is finally squeezed out of the business by his so-called “friend” Mark. And as all the disloyalty is taking place, the film continuously cuts to Mark being in the middle of two court cases. These affairs end up being between the twins, who both ultimately agreed to go to court; and Eduardo, who wants compensation for being cut off. Thus, as a result of all the acts of fickleness and deceitfulness committed by Mark Zuckerberg, we can clearly see how The Social Network ends up showing depicting a relationship turning sour. This completely differs from The King’s Speech; which featured a more compassionate rapport between two mature adults.
]
Image taken from http://www.fasthorseinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/The-Social-Network.jpg
An interesting distinction between The King’s Speech and The Social Network is the depiction of their respective main protagonists. In Hooper’s historic composition, Colin Firth plays Duke Albert; the eventual-King-of-England; a role performed so majestically, that it earned him a Golden Globe. He is a benevolent husband and father cursed with a fear of eventually assuming the royal throne; which has caused him to develop an unfortunate and serious stammer, The then-Duke has such difficulty speaking; so much so that it is hard for him to tell his precious daughters a bedtime story. But, while Firth’s Albert is a good man plagued with a significant speech impediment, The Social Network’s Jesse Eisenberg doesn’t have any health impediments; but he does suffer from an ego and a significant case of apathy. When we meet Mark Zuckerberg at the start of the film, he is bickering with his then-girlfriend at a bar over a series of topics; which eventually leads him to break up with her with no apparent thought of her emotions. And, when dealing with the twins, he doesn’t show any signs of cooperation as he takes their ideas and incorporates them into his own schemes. This is nothing like Duke Albert; who is truly a more sympathetic and caring person.
Another fascinating difference that distinguishes The King’s Speech as the more positive film is that it centers on a meaningful and strong friendship; as evident by the engaging relationship between Firth’s Albert and Geoffrey Rush’s Lionel Logue. When first meeting his new speech therapist, the then-Duke refuses to have assistance from a common person; especially when he is told to stop smoking. But, as The King’s Speech progresses, it is enjoyable to watch the pair partake in their sessions as Rush’s Logue comes up with fascinating exercises to help the troubled Duke loosen up. And when he therapist helps divulge the psychological root of his disability, you can see how the pair have made their relationship become more personable and heartwarming; especially when the film reaches its pivotal climax. This is quite fascinating to keep in mind when comparing the two films; as it is very intriguing that in the Social Network, both boys were friends at the start of the film. However, once Eisenberg’s Mark Zuckerberg starts to implement his goals, his relationship with Andrew Garfield’s Eduardo Saverin begins to crumble drastically. This is evident as he manipulates his companion into giving him money whenever he requires assistance; all the while casually referring to him as Co-Founder of Facebook. And when the film reaches its culmination, their friendship is diminished as Garfield’s Saverin no longer has any financial stake in Facebook and squeezed out of his position in the company. Therefore, the entire torrid relationship between Mark and Eduardo has nothing on the meaningful and touching bond highlighted in The King’s Speech; thus making Duke Albert and Lionel Logue extremely more pleasant figures than those featured in The Social Network.
The King’s Speech is More Inspiring than The Social Network; which Makes it the Better Film
In Fincher’s landmark cinematic work The Social Network, we are introduced to the-Harvard-college-student-now-billionaire Mark Zuckerberg; portrayed with such caustic indifference by Jesse Eisenberg. Set in 2003 and following a not-so-emotional break-up, Zuckerberg originally creates a new website which allows male students to compare their fellow female students’ good looks. However, he hijacks students’ personal information and getting his friend Eduardo Saverin, played by Andrew Garfield, to supply him with the means to do so. His work catches the eyes of twin brothers Cameron and Tyler Winkelvoss, both played by Arnie Hammer, as well as their colleague Divya Narendra, portrayed by Max Minghella; who enlist their fellow student to help them create a new website called The Harvard Collection; an online communication service which would be exclusively available to the student body. Unfortunately for the twins, mark tells the idea to Eduardo, calling it “Thefacebook.” He then has his friend contribute money required to launch the site and spread it throughout the student body. When the twins discover what has occurred, Cameron refuses to sue Mark despite his brother and colleague’s urges. Eventually, Mark and Eduardo meet up with Napster founder Sean Parker, played with great dynamic egotism by Justin Timberlake, who convinces him to drop the “the” from “Thefacebook” as well as how to make money off the website; and eventually, despite Eduardo’s distrust of Sean, Facebook is hugely successful. As events proceed, Eduardo is finally squeezed out of the business by his so-called “friend” Mark. And as all the disloyalty is taking place, the film continuously cuts to Mark being in the middle of two court cases. These affairs end up being between the twins, who both ultimately agreed to go to court; and Eduardo, who wants compensation for being cut off. Thus, as a result of all the acts of fickleness and deceitfulness committed by Mark Zuckerberg, we can clearly see how The Social Network ends up showing depicting a relationship turning sour. This completely differs from The King’s Speech; which featured a more compassionate rapport between two mature adults.
]
Image taken from http://www.fasthorseinc.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/The-Social-Network.jpg
An interesting distinction between The King’s Speech and The Social Network is the depiction of their respective main protagonists. In Hooper’s historic composition, Colin Firth plays Duke Albert; the eventual-King-of-England; a role performed so majestically, that it earned him a Golden Globe. He is a benevolent husband and father cursed with a fear of eventually assuming the royal throne; which has caused him to develop an unfortunate and serious stammer, The then-Duke has such difficulty speaking; so much so that it is hard for him to tell his precious daughters a bedtime story. But, while Firth’s Albert is a good man plagued with a significant speech impediment, The Social Network’s Jesse Eisenberg doesn’t have any health impediments; but he does suffer from an ego and a significant case of apathy. When we meet Mark Zuckerberg at the start of the film, he is bickering with his then-girlfriend at a bar over a series of topics; which eventually leads him to break up with her with no apparent thought of her emotions. And, when dealing with the twins, he doesn’t show any signs of cooperation as he takes their ideas and incorporates them into his own schemes. This is nothing like Duke Albert; who is truly a more sympathetic and caring person.
Another fascinating difference that distinguishes The King’s Speech as the more positive film is that it centers on a meaningful and strong friendship; as evident by the engaging relationship between Firth’s Albert and Geoffrey Rush’s Lionel Logue. When first meeting his new speech therapist, the then-Duke refuses to have assistance from a common person; especially when he is told to stop smoking. But, as The King’s Speech progresses, it is enjoyable to watch the pair partake in their sessions as Rush’s Logue comes up with fascinating exercises to help the troubled Duke loosen up. And when he therapist helps divulge the psychological root of his disability, you can see how the pair have made their relationship become more personable and heartwarming; especially when the film reaches its pivotal climax. This is quite fascinating to keep in mind when comparing the two films; as it is very intriguing that in the Social Network, both boys were friends at the start of the film. However, once Eisenberg’s Mark Zuckerberg starts to implement his goals, his relationship with Andrew Garfield’s Eduardo Saverin begins to crumble drastically. This is evident as he manipulates his companion into giving him money whenever he requires assistance; all the while casually referring to him as Co-Founder of Facebook. And when the film reaches its culmination, their friendship is diminished as Garfield’s Saverin no longer has any financial stake in Facebook and squeezed out of his position in the company. Therefore, the entire torrid relationship between Mark and Eduardo has nothing on the meaningful and touching bond highlighted in The King’s Speech; thus making Duke Albert and Lionel Logue extremely more pleasant figures than those featured in The Social Network.
Image taken from http://nonsensefilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/the-social-network-movie-review1.jpg
While both films differ in tone and human nature, they do share one similar aspect: high-quality acting. While veteran performers Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, and Helena Bonham Carter light up The King’s Speech with their years of experience; the young core cast of The Social Network, consisting of Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, and Justin Timberlake, speak every line with intense energy and act with theatrical energy. As Zuckerberg, Eisenberg remains so entirely expressionless; that even during his most dramatic scenes, his presence is still subdued and lacking of human emotion. His detached presentation makes you completely forget his role in 2009’s horror-comedy Zombieland; in which he plays a cowardly survivor in search of safety away from the undead. And Garfield, who will be seen on movie screens next year as Spiderman, works quite well as the unfortunate Eduardo Saverin; who constantly gets persuaded to finance Mark and his plans. Justin Timberlake gives a great performance as well as the over-confident and gaudy Sean Parker; thus putting aside his image as a musician and showing flair for acting. Thus, all three actors prove that, despite the dismal manner of the film, they are skilled at portraying key figures; just as the elegant core performers of The King’s Speech.
Nevertheless, I do think that The King’s Speech holds a higher candle to Fincher’s drama about the creation of Facebook. While the later is designed to depict the origin of one of the Internet’s most popular websites, I believe that writer David Seidler’s enriching story; combined with Hooper’s grand directing as well as the core actors’ first-class performances deliver a greater lesson in humanity. And, while I do, in fact, feel that The Social Network is worth watching, I believe that The King’s Speech is a film that is worth remembering for years to come
(Image taken from http://www.awardsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/kings-speech-5.jpg0
E-mail me at thatsnatertainment@gmx.com
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Well, That's All from Me for the Night
Thank you for a great night. I'm happy with some of the winners (Colin Firth, Christian Bale) and Natalie Portman; even though I didn't see her movie. I'm really disappointed about quite a few losses, but I'm very happy that they got nominated for their great work. So thank you for a great night and I look forward to posting my next writing.
Well that was an interesting ride, wasn't it?
I mean, The Social Network was good. But The King's Speech is a much better film with a positive and uplifting message about humanity and overcoming fear and a disabilty.
We're Down to the Home Stretch!!
All that's left is best drama!!! I've been having a great time blogging tonight and I thank you for visiting my blog tonight!
It's Only Appropriate that Megan Fox is Introducing a clip of The Tourist
After all, she is the next Angelina Jolie.
Helen Mirren to Showcase The King's Speech
My Favorite Drama of the Year and My Pick for Best Drama!!!!
I' was right!!
I'm a little disappointed that Emma Stone didn't win but she was great in Easy A nevertheless!
I'm a Little Bit Disappointed that Geoffry Rush Didn't Win
But they were both very great in their respective films!
This is going to be a Big Night!!!!
Expect a lot of surprises as these are definately the Golden Globes! And Ricky is making fun of The Tourist!
Welcome to My Live Coverage of the Golden Globes!!!
How do you know I'm live? Because Ricky Gervais is now on stage and making fun of Charlie Sheen!
It’s Almost That Time!!!
In less than two hours, The 68th Annual Golden Globes will air on NBC and my coverage will begin! Just a few things to keep in mind about tonight’s ceremony:
1. I will be keeping track of who’s winning, who’s losing, and some other matters. Please feel free to comment on my blog or on my Facebook page; I will ask any questions that are posted.
2. Keep checking my predictions and see if I’m either on a roll or falling behind. I’m very excited to who is going to win tonight.
3. Most important to remember, these are The Golden Globes. So anyone can win and anything can happen. So there could be some surprises in store tonight.
So keep checking my blog throughout the evening, have a drink or a snack, and relax. Also, stay alert for any movie references made throughout the night. It’s going to be a lot of fun and I’ll see you all at 8:00pm!
1. I will be keeping track of who’s winning, who’s losing, and some other matters. Please feel free to comment on my blog or on my Facebook page; I will ask any questions that are posted.
2. Keep checking my predictions and see if I’m either on a roll or falling behind. I’m very excited to who is going to win tonight.
3. Most important to remember, these are The Golden Globes. So anyone can win and anything can happen. So there could be some surprises in store tonight.
So keep checking my blog throughout the evening, have a drink or a snack, and relax. Also, stay alert for any movie references made throughout the night. It’s going to be a lot of fun and I’ll see you all at 8:00pm!
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Reminder about Tomorrow Night
As we all know, tomorrow at 8:00pm on NBC is the 68th Annual Golden Globes. I’m going to be blogging throughout the evening; commenting on who’s winning and who’s losing and other things in between . And it’s bound to be an exciting night for all.
Also, in terms of my next review, I’m going to be doing something a little different. Instead of just a regular critique or performance analysis, my next writing will be a more comparative piece. So, by Wednesday evening at the latest, expect something really exciting/
So, get ready for tomorrow night. Check out my predictions and make up your own. It’s going to be a lot of fun and it’s all going to be LIVE!!!!
Also, in terms of my next review, I’m going to be doing something a little different. Instead of just a regular critique or performance analysis, my next writing will be a more comparative piece. So, by Wednesday evening at the latest, expect something really exciting/
So, get ready for tomorrow night. Check out my predictions and make up your own. It’s going to be a lot of fun and it’s all going to be LIVE!!!!
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
And Now It’s…. Golden Globes Prediction Time!!!
After a lot of thinking, I have come up with my predictions for Sunday’s Golden Globes. Most of the nominated movies I have seen; but there are some I haven’t and I’m making logical guesses based on positive reviews and word of mouth. So those predictions are marked with a (*). I gave each prediction a short statement as to why it’s my choice. So, with no further interruptions, I present….
My Predictions for the 2011 Golden Globes!!!!!
BEST PICTURE- DRAMA: The King’s Speech (I would be very happy to see this inspirational movie win this award. It was very historically accurate and it truly was an emotional masterpiece.)
BEST PICTURE- MUSICAL OR COMEDY: The Kids Are Alright (*) (I haven’t seen this movie but I hear it’s very good and very moving.)
BEST DIRECTOR: Tom Hooper- The King’s Speech (He conducted the core performers’ amazing performances and he’s most likely going to get recognized)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A MOTION PICTURE: Geoffrey Rush- The King’s Speech (This is a difficult choice because Christian Bale really went very far for his role. But I do see Geoffrey Rush winning; he was very first-class in this movie. But if Christian Bale does win, then I’d be very happy being wrong. In fact, I’d be very happy if either Rush or Bale won.)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A MOTION PICUTRE: Helena Bonham Carter- The King’s Speech (Definitely see her winning for her great performance)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE- DRAMA: Colin Firth- The King’s Speech (No surprise. He was terrific as the eventual King of England and he gave an elegant and uplifting performance. It’s his time)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE- DRAM,A: Natalie Portman- Black Swan (*) (She’s been getting a lot of positive press for her performance and she’s definitely the favorite in this category)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE- MUSICAL OR COMEDY: Johnny Depp- Alice in Wonderland (I definitely see him winning for this movie mainly because of all the hype he gotten before and after the film)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE- MUSICAL OR COMEDY: Annette Benning- The Kids Are Alright (*) (I did not see this movie but I hear she gave a very striking performance and is destined to win the Academy Award as well).
So these are my predictions for Sunday night. However, I’m going to try to review one more nominated film before then. And during the ceremony, I’m going to blog my comments on who is winning and whether or not any of my predictions have come true. While we wait for Sunday, you could comment on my predictions and post your own on my blog or my Facebook page. You can check out who is nominated for which movie by going to http://www.imdb.com/features/globes/2011/nominations. So have fun and let’s look forward to an exciting weekend and a lot more Nater-Tainment!!
My Predictions for the 2011 Golden Globes!!!!!
BEST PICTURE- DRAMA: The King’s Speech (I would be very happy to see this inspirational movie win this award. It was very historically accurate and it truly was an emotional masterpiece.)
BEST PICTURE- MUSICAL OR COMEDY: The Kids Are Alright (*) (I haven’t seen this movie but I hear it’s very good and very moving.)
BEST DIRECTOR: Tom Hooper- The King’s Speech (He conducted the core performers’ amazing performances and he’s most likely going to get recognized)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A MOTION PICTURE: Geoffrey Rush- The King’s Speech (This is a difficult choice because Christian Bale really went very far for his role. But I do see Geoffrey Rush winning; he was very first-class in this movie. But if Christian Bale does win, then I’d be very happy being wrong. In fact, I’d be very happy if either Rush or Bale won.)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN A MOTION PICUTRE: Helena Bonham Carter- The King’s Speech (Definitely see her winning for her great performance)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE- DRAMA: Colin Firth- The King’s Speech (No surprise. He was terrific as the eventual King of England and he gave an elegant and uplifting performance. It’s his time)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE- DRAM,A: Natalie Portman- Black Swan (*) (She’s been getting a lot of positive press for her performance and she’s definitely the favorite in this category)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE- MUSICAL OR COMEDY: Johnny Depp- Alice in Wonderland (I definitely see him winning for this movie mainly because of all the hype he gotten before and after the film)
BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE- MUSICAL OR COMEDY: Annette Benning- The Kids Are Alright (*) (I did not see this movie but I hear she gave a very striking performance and is destined to win the Academy Award as well).
So these are my predictions for Sunday night. However, I’m going to try to review one more nominated film before then. And during the ceremony, I’m going to blog my comments on who is winning and whether or not any of my predictions have come true. While we wait for Sunday, you could comment on my predictions and post your own on my blog or my Facebook page. You can check out who is nominated for which movie by going to http://www.imdb.com/features/globes/2011/nominations. So have fun and let’s look forward to an exciting weekend and a lot more Nater-Tainment!!
Golden Globe Nominated Performance Review #2: Christian Bale and Mark Wahlberg in "The Fighter"
When going to see a movie, all eyes must be front-and-center on the leading actor or actress at all times. If it’s a comedy, the lead performer theoretically has to supply the film’s sunniest moments. And if it’s a drama, the star technically has to handle the motion picture’s heaviest material. Thus, said performer has to be very talented as well as capable of providing an emotionally honest performance. However, there are occasions in which the supporting player ends up carrying the movie’s most emotional material; thus becoming the one the viewers are focused on. An example of this scenario would be David O’ Russell’s cinematic drama "The Fighter"; in which Christian Bale’s emotional performance as supporting character Dickey Ekland completely outshines Mark Wahlberg’s enervated part as chief protagonist Micky Ward. Thus, I can say without looking back that:
Christian Bale Proves to Be the Real Champion of "The Fighter" and Surpasses Mark Wahlberg
Christian Bale Proves to Be the Real Champion of "The Fighter" and Surpasses Mark Wahlberg
Image taken from http://www.teenfi.com/image-library/land/376/t/the-fighter-christian-bale.jpg
Set in the mid 1980’s in Lowell, Massachusetts, "The Fighter" tells the true story of Micky Ward, portrayed by Wahlberg, and Dickey Ekland, played by Bale, two brothers who are being followed by a camera crew for a HBO documentary. Dicky is a former boxer that has been celebrated for defeating combatant Sugar Ray Leonard and his success has gone to his head; so much so that he constantly brags about his victory to everyone he knows or crosses paths with. Now, he is training his brother Micky; who wants to break out of his brother’s shadow and become a winner himself. Unfortunately, Dicky isn’t the most dependable trainer as he does not appear when his family prepares to go to Atlantic City for Micky’s pivotal boxing match. The brothers’ mother and Micky’s manager Alice, played with such power by Melissa Leo, discover that Dicky brother is at a house doing drugs with his friends. Following a spat with their father George, played by Jack McGee, the family goes to Atlantic City for the fight which unfortunately does not go as well as planned as Micky is forced to fight an opponent far larger than him after the original challenger got sick; unfortunately resulting in Micky losing the match. Things get worst following an uncomfortable family dinner in which Micky’s new girlfriend Charlene, played strongly by Amy Adams, meets his kin and recommends that he hires a new administrator and that he dumps his brother as his trainer along with loses his mother as his manager. In an attempt to make things better, Dicky develops an ill-conceived plan to help raise money for training; which unfortunately involves prostitution. Consequently; Dicky gets into a fight with the local cops and Micky arrives on the scene to help sort things out; unfortunately leading the authorities to break his hand and arresting both brothers for disruptive behavior. While the younger brother is let go, Dicky is incarcerated; leaving the younger brother to go with a new manager as his older sibling serves time. And while Wahlberg primarily handles the biopic’s generic fist-hitting action as Micky Ward, Bale gives the performance of his career as Dicky Ekland; who eventually proves to be the film’s true emotional center.
Image Taken from http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/09/16/article-0-0B36046F000005DC-573_468x268.jpg
Image taken from http://cbschicago.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/the-fighter.jpg?w=420
But when you do compare Wahlberg’s general act as the official lead to Bale’s more brilliant performance, the variations are more than evident. First of all, Wahlberg’s Micky’s physique appears no different than his previous films; whereas Christian Bale went-the-extra-mile to resemble Dicky Ekland’s physical build and traits. Another obviously generic aspect of Wahlberg’s performance is that his influence carries no dramatic weight or force; in other words, whenever he raises the tone of his voice- it’s just Wahlberg speaking at a louder pitch. In other words, there is no bang or punch to his dialogue; while Bale enables every spoken-word to stick with you. Furthermore, every time Wahlberg’s Micky interacts with Leo’s Alice or Adams’ Charlene, there is a lack of emotional compassion present; in other words, you don’t feel for him as he gives a flat recital at all time. Thankfully, Bale’s amazing act as Dicky is so powerful that even when he is not the subject of the topic at hand, his vibrant presence is felt at all times. In addition, when Wahlberg is interacting with Adams or Leo, it is obvious that his co-stars’ performances pack more strength and energy. You could even go as far as to say that whenever Bale, Leo, and Adams are interrelating, Wahlberg’s physical and emotional presence in the film is almost undetectable; and the only times his presence is noticeable are when he’s in the boxing ring. In other words, Mark Wahlberg’s dramatic scenes in The Fighter are not as memorable as Bale’s and their co-stars’; who ultimately end up providing the film’s most theatrical scenes.
Image taken from http://www.flicksandbits.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/bale-the-fighter.jpg
But when Mark Wahlberg is acting along with Christian Bale, there is somewhat of a noticeable improvement in his acting. Since they are playing brothers, the two had to ensure that they each gave an emotional performance when acting with each other. And while Bale is obviously the better artist between the two, Wahlberg actually bring a some zest to the plate; particularly in a scene in which his Micky Ward gives Bale’s Dicky Ekland some troubling news regarding his older brother’s position as trainer. However, Bale still ends up giving the more unforgettable performance; just for his striking reaction. In short terms, Christian Bale is just the better actor in every way.
In the long run, "The Fighter" eventually ends up being a showcase for the supporting cast; and Mark Wahlberg, who essentially is the film’s star, is relegated to being more of a magnet for his opponents’ fist punches. And Christian Bale’s dramatic stint as Dicky Ekland is definitely a performance to profoundly keep in mind this Awards Season; which is filled with many great showcases. Furthermore, out of the two performers, I definitely see Bale receiving higher accolades than his film’s essential lead. Henceforth, since he gave a much more amazing performance, maybe Christian Bale should be hired as Mark Wahlberg’s new acting coach. That way, life will have successfully imitated art.Friday, January 7, 2011
Golden Globes’ Nominated Film Review: "The King’s Speech"
As Award Season approaches, I am in the process of pinpointing my favorite drama of the past year; and the possibilities are many. Was it Inception; thanks in large part to Christopher Nolan’s creative camera work and spellbinding special effects that left audiences razzled and dazzled? Was it "The Town"; most likely due to Ben Affleck’s cinematic comeback through intense car chases and sequences of fiery gunshots? Or was it Director David Fincher and "The Social Network’s" core cast of talented young actors that guided captivated crowds throughout the chilling creation of Facebook? But maybe, my preferred drama of 2010 would just simply be a historic sequence of events leading up to Britain’s involvement in World War II focusing heavily on character development and an uplifting message about overcoming trepidation through the power of friendship and determination. With much thankfulness to Director Tom Hooper and grand performances by acting greats Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush, I can triumphantly decree that:
"The King’s Speech" Delivers Everything I Want for The Best Drama of 2010
Initially set in the mid 1920’s, we are introduced to King George V’s son and then-Duke of York Albert, played masterfully by Firth, who is set to speak at Wembley Stadium in England. Unfortunately, Albert immensely articulates with a grim stammer and he can barely get a word broadcasted over the loudspeaker. His speech impediment has caused so much lack-of-self-confidence that the Duke’s loving and devoted wife Elizabeth, played with such beauty and elegance by Helena Bonham Carter, goes out to find a counselor to aid for her husband. She eventually discovers therapist Lionel Logue, portrayed with great keenness and strength of mind by Rush, and inquires for his assistance. While at first uncertain to take the Duke on as a client, Logue sets up a session with Albert; who is hesitant to be working with a commoner as well as refusing to agree with his therapist’s own set of rules. As the first session ultimately ends in anger, Logue presents a recording of the distressed Duke reciting Shakespeare as part of an exercise for free. When listening to the soundtrack of their session, Albert hears himself speak without a single stammer; which was recorded over a classical score by Mozart; leading him to return to Logue and the meetings eventually commence. What follows is a strong story of human perseverance as Logue guides the-eventual-King-of-England through many exercises designed to pinpoint the origin of his stammer; ultimately leading the pair to form a close and momentous friendship. In short, the movie, while technically a historic drama, is really an expression of humanity.
Image taken from http://www.filmjunk.com/images/weblog/2011/01/2010_the_kings_speech_001.jpg
Most of "The King’s Speech’s" high points come from the ensemble’s stunning portrayals of their key roles; especially Colin Firth’s masterful performance as the soon-to-be King of England. During the course of the film, the actor plays a historic figure that is engrossed in plight. While it is initially suspected that Albert’s stammer might be a regular speech impediment, it is discovered that his troubles are larger than originally thought. The audience finds out that the Duke’s father King George V, played by Michael Gambon, is becoming seriously ill and older brother David, played by Guy Pearce, is next in line to be King; but while he does make it to power, he spends more time with an American divorce and ignores his royal responsibilities. This causes Albert great anxiety as he is quite terrified of possibly assuming the throne. As a result of his serious nervousness, his speech impediment grows worse and it ends up being quite clear that all his worries are completely psychosomatic. And Firth gives the performance of a lifetime as his character falters his speech in fits of anger, sadness, and immense fear. And watching Firth’s Albert bond with his loving wife Elizabeth and precocious daughters Margaret and Elizabeth brings a tear to your eye and tugs at your heart. In short, Firth’s portrayal is so pure that you think that you are really watching the life of the then-Duke unfold in front of your eyes.
While Firth’s performance as Albert is quite impressive, Geoffrey Rush turns in an excellent presentation as the Duke’s unwavering speech psychoanalyst Lionel Logue. Watching Rush’s Logue interact with Firth’s Albert is a grand extravagance as the pair demonstrate such perfect chemistry in every sequence together. When conducting a session, Rush’s Logue subjects the uptight Duke to series of unorthodox exercises intended to trace the origin of his impediment; this includes rolling around on the floor in an attempt to loosen up, cursing, and stating his own personal problems inside musical fashion in an attempt to discover the psychological source of his vocal predicament. And despite Albert’s attempts to rebuff his therapist’s motives, Logue is ultimately able to help him eventually comprehends what caused the Duke to develop his verbal problem. And throughout the movie, it is great to see the pair’s association move from a therapist-patient relationship to an influential closeness.
Image taken from http://www.thevine.com.au/resources/imgdetail/the-kings-speech-movie-revi_141210034655.jpg
Besides its historic context and its thespians’ brilliant portrayals, "The King’s Speech" also benefits from screenwriter David Seidler’s delivery of important notions within his script. One important theme that is brought up during the film is the idea that fear holds people back from achieving greatness. This thought is important to consider as Firth’s Albert is terrified of eventually assuming the throne. As his father’s health deteriorates and his brother continues to pay no attention to his responsibilities as king, the Duke knows that he is going to have to rule the country. And as a result of his increasing terror and extreme lack of confidence, Albert’s stutter becomes more noticeable and grave. But, Rush’s Logue is able to realize this and reassures the troubled soon-to-be King that he is capable of being a grand ruler. Another great meaning that Seidler and the film expresses is the importance of family and friendship in overcoming personal shortcomings. In addition to being his speech therapist, Rush’s Logue takes time to discuss the troubled Duke’s personal problems; particularly about his brother and his fear of ruling England. Also, Albert’s wife and daughters are always by his side and preserve his spirits. In short, while its purpose is to enhance audiences through history, "The King’s Speech" true function is to express compassion for your fellow man and eachother.
All in all, "The King’s Speech" is not only my favorite drama of the year; it is officially one of my all-time favorite movies. It is so wonderful to see a historic recount that is not only truthful but also inspirational. And throughout the film, different emotions are evoked through the performers and the script. These include sadness, anger, love, and even humor; as evident through some humorous exchanges that Firth’s Albert and Rush’s Logue share during their sessions and other scenes in which they are together. In short, the whole movie simply engrosses the audience in every way possible as there is never a tedious moment. Therefore, I recommend "The King’s Speech" to not only history buffs or film enthusiasts; but also anyone who has a thirst for knowledge, enlightenment, and life.
Email me at thatsnatertainment@gmx.com
"The King’s Speech" Delivers Everything I Want for The Best Drama of 2010
Initially set in the mid 1920’s, we are introduced to King George V’s son and then-Duke of York Albert, played masterfully by Firth, who is set to speak at Wembley Stadium in England. Unfortunately, Albert immensely articulates with a grim stammer and he can barely get a word broadcasted over the loudspeaker. His speech impediment has caused so much lack-of-self-confidence that the Duke’s loving and devoted wife Elizabeth, played with such beauty and elegance by Helena Bonham Carter, goes out to find a counselor to aid for her husband. She eventually discovers therapist Lionel Logue, portrayed with great keenness and strength of mind by Rush, and inquires for his assistance. While at first uncertain to take the Duke on as a client, Logue sets up a session with Albert; who is hesitant to be working with a commoner as well as refusing to agree with his therapist’s own set of rules. As the first session ultimately ends in anger, Logue presents a recording of the distressed Duke reciting Shakespeare as part of an exercise for free. When listening to the soundtrack of their session, Albert hears himself speak without a single stammer; which was recorded over a classical score by Mozart; leading him to return to Logue and the meetings eventually commence. What follows is a strong story of human perseverance as Logue guides the-eventual-King-of-England through many exercises designed to pinpoint the origin of his stammer; ultimately leading the pair to form a close and momentous friendship. In short, the movie, while technically a historic drama, is really an expression of humanity.
Image taken from http://www.filmjunk.com/images/weblog/2011/01/2010_the_kings_speech_001.jpg
Most of "The King’s Speech’s" high points come from the ensemble’s stunning portrayals of their key roles; especially Colin Firth’s masterful performance as the soon-to-be King of England. During the course of the film, the actor plays a historic figure that is engrossed in plight. While it is initially suspected that Albert’s stammer might be a regular speech impediment, it is discovered that his troubles are larger than originally thought. The audience finds out that the Duke’s father King George V, played by Michael Gambon, is becoming seriously ill and older brother David, played by Guy Pearce, is next in line to be King; but while he does make it to power, he spends more time with an American divorce and ignores his royal responsibilities. This causes Albert great anxiety as he is quite terrified of possibly assuming the throne. As a result of his serious nervousness, his speech impediment grows worse and it ends up being quite clear that all his worries are completely psychosomatic. And Firth gives the performance of a lifetime as his character falters his speech in fits of anger, sadness, and immense fear. And watching Firth’s Albert bond with his loving wife Elizabeth and precocious daughters Margaret and Elizabeth brings a tear to your eye and tugs at your heart. In short, Firth’s portrayal is so pure that you think that you are really watching the life of the then-Duke unfold in front of your eyes.
While Firth’s performance as Albert is quite impressive, Geoffrey Rush turns in an excellent presentation as the Duke’s unwavering speech psychoanalyst Lionel Logue. Watching Rush’s Logue interact with Firth’s Albert is a grand extravagance as the pair demonstrate such perfect chemistry in every sequence together. When conducting a session, Rush’s Logue subjects the uptight Duke to series of unorthodox exercises intended to trace the origin of his impediment; this includes rolling around on the floor in an attempt to loosen up, cursing, and stating his own personal problems inside musical fashion in an attempt to discover the psychological source of his vocal predicament. And despite Albert’s attempts to rebuff his therapist’s motives, Logue is ultimately able to help him eventually comprehends what caused the Duke to develop his verbal problem. And throughout the movie, it is great to see the pair’s association move from a therapist-patient relationship to an influential closeness.
Image taken from http://www.thevine.com.au/resources/imgdetail/the-kings-speech-movie-revi_141210034655.jpg
Besides its historic context and its thespians’ brilliant portrayals, "The King’s Speech" also benefits from screenwriter David Seidler’s delivery of important notions within his script. One important theme that is brought up during the film is the idea that fear holds people back from achieving greatness. This thought is important to consider as Firth’s Albert is terrified of eventually assuming the throne. As his father’s health deteriorates and his brother continues to pay no attention to his responsibilities as king, the Duke knows that he is going to have to rule the country. And as a result of his increasing terror and extreme lack of confidence, Albert’s stutter becomes more noticeable and grave. But, Rush’s Logue is able to realize this and reassures the troubled soon-to-be King that he is capable of being a grand ruler. Another great meaning that Seidler and the film expresses is the importance of family and friendship in overcoming personal shortcomings. In addition to being his speech therapist, Rush’s Logue takes time to discuss the troubled Duke’s personal problems; particularly about his brother and his fear of ruling England. Also, Albert’s wife and daughters are always by his side and preserve his spirits. In short, while its purpose is to enhance audiences through history, "The King’s Speech" true function is to express compassion for your fellow man and eachother.
All in all, "The King’s Speech" is not only my favorite drama of the year; it is officially one of my all-time favorite movies. It is so wonderful to see a historic recount that is not only truthful but also inspirational. And throughout the film, different emotions are evoked through the performers and the script. These include sadness, anger, love, and even humor; as evident through some humorous exchanges that Firth’s Albert and Rush’s Logue share during their sessions and other scenes in which they are together. In short, the whole movie simply engrosses the audience in every way possible as there is never a tedious moment. Therefore, I recommend "The King’s Speech" to not only history buffs or film enthusiasts; but also anyone who has a thirst for knowledge, enlightenment, and life.
Email me at thatsnatertainment@gmx.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)