Film Review: "Prometheus"

(Warning:  This review does contain spoilers)

Science fiction has always been a genre of film that has always struck me as a mixed bag. On one hand, it is always been fun to be whisked away to different worlds; thus leading to exciting adventures . Also, observing bright stars, colorful planets, and digitally-enhanced creatures is always enjoyable; especially when it's all filmed in eye-popping 3D. Furthermore, the continuing battles between good and evil frequently allows me to cheer for the heroes and fear the villains. However, these ideas, especially the last one, are only effectual if the screenwriter pens a well-thought-out script that encases strong character development and enough twists and turns that leave the audience wanting more. And on June 8, I viewed a film that, while telling an engrossing story as well as many unexpected surprises, lacked entirely-developed characters; save for the two most important figures. I'm talking about “Prometheus;” the latest big-budget film from Director Ridley Scott, the creator of such epics films as 1979's “Alien” and 2000's “Gladiator.” Throughout his latest offering, Scott helms many sequences that result in the audience holding on to their seats in a state of shock. Unfortunately, Screenwriters Jon Spaiths and Damon Lindelof fail to pay enough attention to most of the film's characters. Fortunately, however, stars Noomi Rapace and Michael Fassbender, who portray the two most important characters in “Prometheus” are allotted opportunities to demonstrate high-quality acting. Thus, it is without any hesitation that I say:

Though it has it's Problems. “Prometheus” Provides an Interesting Story and a Powerful Showcase of Noomi Rapace and Michael Fassbender!

In 2089, archaeologists Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, played with great determination by Noomi Rapace, and her partner Charlie Holloway, played by Logan Marshall-Green, notice ancient paintings depicting a man gesturing to a collection of stars. The film then cuts to a giant space ship, named The Prometheus,traveling through the universe; eventually revealed to be set in the year 2093. On board are a group of crew members in hypersleep. They are monitored by David, played with great flair by Michael Fassbender, who is, in actuality, an android that is almost indistinguishable from human beings. Soon, the crew, including Elizabeth Shaw and Charlie Holloway, awake and are gathered for a meeting. The meeting is started off by Meredith Vickers, played firmly by Charlize Theron, an employee of the Wayland Corporation; a high-tech corporation that is sponsoring the mission. Vickers presents a holographic message of Peter Wayland, played by an unrecognizable Guy Pearce, the elderly CEO of the Wayland Corporation; who is presumed to have passed away. Wayland introduces everyone to Noomi Rapace's Elizabeth Shaw and Logan Marshall-Green's Charlie Holloway; who proceed to explain their research. They present holographic images that Dr. Elizabeth Shaw indicates as an “invitation” to meet mankind's creators-- the Engineers. Soon, the Prometheus lands on a mysterious planet called LV-223. A team consisting of Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, Charlie Holloway, Michael Fassbender's David and fellow researchers Fifield and Milburn, played by Rafe Spall and Sean Harris respectfully, explore an ancient building.  Soon after entering,  David triggers a holographic image of human-like aliens running from an unknown threat; as well as the body of one of the beings that had apparently gotten decapitated. David also opens a door; revealing the head as well as a collection of containers filled with an unknown black ooze; one of which he acquires; unbeknownst by the team. A storm begins brewing and Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, Holloway, and David make it back to the ship; along with the detached head. Unfortunately, team-members Fifield and Milborne get lost and are forced to camp for the evening. On board The Prometheus, Noomi Rapace's Elizabeth Shaw and Logan Marshall-Green's Charlie Holloway examine the head along with Charlize Theron's Meredith Vickers; eventually seeing that the DNA is similar to that of a human's. They deduce that this is the head of an Engineer and that the beings are now assumed to be extinct; as they had dated the body of the Engineer as being  2,000 years old. However, as time goes on, the team, uncovers terrifying truths that could threaten the very existence of mankind. And the audience, in turn, discover that “Prometheus” is an intriguing film despite its shortcomings.

Throughout Ridley Scott's latest film, there are assorted points that prove to be either positive or negative; and most of this concept falls into the concept of the film's characters. Perhaps one of the best developed characters would have to be Noomi Rapace's Dr. Elizabeth Shaw. Throughout the film, Shaw undergoes a significant emotional transformation. When first meeting Noomi Rapace's on-screen persona, she is a very spiritual individual; as evident by the cross she wears around her neck. Rapace's character believes that there is a force out there that is responsible for mankind's existence. During the first portion of the film, When giving her presentation at the start of the film, we can note her immense certainty that the origins of mankind are out there. Though, it should also be mentioned that she is still cautious; as telling Michael Fassbender's David to not open the mysterious door in the ancient temple. These scenes are made quite convincing; due to Rapace's acting. The twinkle of curiosity is clear in her eyes; but we can also see a strong sense of trepidation present in her movement. In other words, though she is eager to find the Engineers and uncover the truth about mankind's existance, Noomi Rapace's Dr. Elizabeth Shaw is a very guarded individual who has a quest for knowledge.

As the film progresses, it is intriguing to see how the intensity of the mission allows the character to make the emotional transformation from being a restrained researcher to a bold fighter. At the start of the film's second half, a life-threatening event occurs that causes her to take drastic action. Instead of hesitating, Noomi Rapace's character acts quickly; performing a procedure that could endanger her life even further.  And even though this particular sequence is very difficult to watch, due to its heavy intensity, the audience is able to And believe the pain that Noomi Rapace's on-screen persona is enduring. And as “Prometheus” continues, Noomi Rapace's character does what ever she could to survive; going as far as to risk her life in immensely threatening situations. In other words, Noomi Rapace's Dr. Elizabeth Shaw ransformed into a real combatant.And thanks to Rapace's acting, the transition is truly believable.



Image of Noomi Rapace as Dr. Elizabeth Shaw taken from
http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&sa=X&biw=1607&bih=750&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnso&tbnid=kc6eN8ueoypmTM:&imgrefurl=http://tucsoncitizen.com/comic-matters/%3Fattachment_id%3D572&docid=0ObU2qzxKrmDdM&imgurl=http://tucsoncitizen.com/comic-matters/files/2012/06/P-1.jpg&w=550&h=368&ei=iCDpT8faKs2s0AG4oomODQ&zoom=1

While Noomi Rapace's performance as Dr. Elizabeth Shaw is very believable, it is very important to keep in mind Michael Fassbender's sharp portrayal of David; the cryptic android of The Prometheus. Throughout his tenure in the film, Fassbender maintains his unfaltering performance. The actor speaks his dialogue in a in a calm manner in an attempt to not display intense rage. This allows the actor to remain in a state of enigma-- thus keeping the audience guessing whether the character's overall intentions are either good or evil. We do not know if Fassbender's character has been programmed by Guy Peace’s Peter Wayland, or if he is just acting on his own. Fassbender's performance sends chills up your spine; as his on-screen persona can even look at a member of the crew with an unemphatic stare. In short terms, Michael Fassbender fully allows his character to remain completely grounded; thus never acting in an over-the-top manner. We believe Michael Fassbender's performance as David; so much so, that we often forget that this is the same actor who portrayed Erik Lensherr; the electromagnetic mutant that became known as the egotist “Magneto” in 2011's “X-Men: First Class.” Simply put, Michael Fassbender's achievement as David is one of the greatest components of “Prometheus.”

Image of Michael Fassbender as David taken from http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&sa=X&biw=1607&bih=750&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnsuo&tbnid=gvRe0eTJHsEnLM:&imgrefurl=http://www.leahraeder.com/words/opinion/prometheus-philosophical-sci-fi/attachment/prometheus-michael-fassbender_400/&docid=cMskTMzKMWWoKM&imgurl=http://www.leahraeder.com/words/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/prometheus-michael-fassbender_400.jpg&w=400&h=300&ei=UA_pT_vKDMbB0AHf-rj2DA&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=836&vpy=317&dur=2000&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=131&ty=121&sig=101901119017197694265&page=1&tbnh=127&tbnw=170&start=0&ndsp=33&ved=1t:429,r:20,s:0,i:137

While Screenwriters Jon Spaiths and Damon Landelof provides strong characterization for Noomi Rapace's Dr. Elizabeth Shaw and Michael Fassbender's David, he fails to pay plenty of time to fully distinguish most of the other characters of “Prometheus.” because of this, the other figures come off as being thinly created or even unnecessary. For instance, Meredith Vickers, though firmly portrayed by Charlize Theron, just appears as a typical official. Theron's on-screen persona declares her orders to the crew and refuses to put her foot down when others object. Though the screenwriters does allow Theron's Vickers to retain a cryptic aura, the character isn't given much to do. And when a significant revelation concerning the character emerges, the impact falls flat; as it just appears tacked on by the screenwriters.

Another character in “Prometheus” that seemed nonindustrial would be Elizabeth Shaw's partner Charlie Holloway. Throughout his term in the film, Logan Marshall-Green's Holloway doesn't appear to have a unique personality; as he seems to just be pre-occupied with finding the Engineers; thus achieving glory. Other than this, Marshall-Green's Holloway just didn't seem to have enough time to be thoroughly fleshed out as a character and seemed to serve primarily as a plot devicefor the film. In other words, it's as if the soul purpose of Marshall-Green's Holloway was for him to meet his eventual fate. The same could be said for Rafe Spall's Milburn and Sean Harris' Fifield; the two scientists who were unable to find their way back on board The Prometheus when the storm hit. Both scientists were contribute anything spectacular to the film's central plot; and they seemed as if they were only included in the film to meet gruesome demises. Because of this, the characters didn't serve unique purposes; thus resulting in them being completely expandable. This is primarily the fault of Damon Lindelof; who basically saw these two characters as excuses to include more grizzly fates in the film and nothing more. This is truly a shame; because if Milburn and Fifield weren't in the film, Jon Spaiths and Damon Lindelof could have spent additional time to further-ehance the story.

I will say, however, that Idris Elba's performance as Janez, the unfaltering captain of The Prometheus, was very good. Throughout the tenure of the film, Elba ensured that his on-screen persona was prudent to his job; as he was monitoring the team's activity on LV-223.  The actor also had decent chemistry with Charlize Theron's Meredith Vickers; as the two shared some significant confrontations. I must also commend Elba for maintaining an engaging Southern accent throughout his portrayal of Janek; one that added some uniqueness to his character.  Idris Elba did a fine job portraying Janek; I just wish that Idris Elba possessed a tad more screentime; just so we could explore his character more.  But alas, this wasn't the case. 



Image of Idris Elba as Janez taken from http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&biw=1607&bih=750&tbm=isch&tbnid=XD7jG-HhZYY6QM:&imgrefurl=http://hellgarve.com/HellGarve/revista/prometheus-a-first-review-opens-june-1&docid=jdykGhEWQpR7RM&imgurl=http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01518/prometheus-532a_1518753a.jpg&w=532&h=392&ei=5B7pT72MDKXX0QHJrJzGDQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=1172&vpy=422&dur=266&hovh=193&hovw=262&tx=171&ty=113&sig=101901119017197694265&page=1&tbnh=130&tbnw=163&start=0&ndsp=30&ved=1t:429,r:20,s:0,i:134

And this leads me to another one of my quibbles with “Prometheus.” While the film's narrative was exciting and filled with unexpected surprises, its overall pacing isn't  great. Clocking in at one hundred and twenty-four minutes, it seemed as if Screenwriters Jon Spaiths and Damon Lindelof wanted to pack in as much as possible into the entire duration. The first half of the film is set up quite well; we get to meet the characters and the mission is explained finely. The exploration of LV-223 is gripping; as we are introduced to this unusual new world. The examination of the Engineer's detached cranium is also riveting; as we come to understand that these humanoid beings are responsible for our very existence. However, it is after the near-death experience of Noomi Rapace's Dr. Elizabeth Shaw that the film starts to slightly weaken. Certain elements of the film appear hurried; such as a revelation concerning Guy Pearce's Peter Wayland.  I could see how the screenwriters wanted to provide a shock to the audience; but unfortunately, the scenes appear rushed and could have been better executed.  The same goes for the final portions of the film.  It appeared that Jon Spaiths and David Lindelof wanted to consume the remaining time with plenty of action; but the everything just goes by too quickly.  This results in certain components to the story moving along too quickly; thus sacrificing more time to add more drama. I don't want to reveal what happens; but, in all honesty, maybe if the film had been a tad longer, there could have been more development for certain characters and additional elements to the story.

However, I will say that "Prometheus" is not at all tedious.  Throughout the film. there is never a moment that is drawn out. There is always an instance that causes the audiences to think deeply or genuinely gasp in a moment of pure shock. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that attention to the details of computer-generated creatures is perfect; thus enhancing the intensity of the film for the better,  In addition, I must applaud the filmmakers for putting strong emphasis on The Engineers; as we get to learn about their existence and just what they are capable of.  And, whenever an Engineer is actually shown on screen, the audience is able to gaze in shock; as these hulking beings are presented as our creators. Because of all this, Director Ridley Scott has your attention right from the start of the film.  The viewer is always on the edge of their seat; eagerly awaiting whatever happens next.   And THAT is a great accomplishment!

All in all, “Prometheus” delivers something that most present-day science fiction films don't seem to possess: a very interesting story. The whole concept of scientists traveling through the universe to discover mankind's origins indeed possesses strong potential; and thanks to Ridley Scott, we are ab;e to be completely enthralled by the plot and not be distracted by all the special effects and 3D technology. We are basically learning along with Noomi Rapace's Dr. Elizabeth Shaw and her colleagues; all the while sharing in the surprises they are experiencing. And though the screenplay does resort to typical science-fiction tropes, Jon Spaiths and Damon Lindelof do succeed in maintaining our viewership. We can sill watch the film and not be tempted to keep looking at our watches to see how much longer the movie should be. Instead, however, we are strongly tempted to cover our eyes during scenes that are quite alarming. But that, my friends, is an article for another time.

E-mail me at thatsnatertainment@gmx.com

From the Mind of Nate: My Overall Opinions of the Thirty-Seventh Season of "Saturday Night Live"

Well, the Thirty-seventh season of “Saturday Night Live” has come to an end and I am disappointed. Not because the 2011-2012 season is over, but because the writing has ended up being quite sub-par. A lot of the time the show's writers have scripted sketches that were either rehashes of previously-done material or segments with an original premise that unfortunately contains the same joke being repeated over and over. This is unsatisfying; seeing as every week I tune in to see a different host participate in sketches with the show's cast. And when I see the host get assigned material that doesn't allow them as well as the cast to demonstrate their comedic talents. What's worse, the worse the writing is, the more forgettable the episode is; seeing as there isn't anything worth reflecting. Fortunately, however, most of the performances of a designated host and the cast enabled the quality of a show to improve. Thus, when looking back at my live-blogging reports and episode reviews, I just can't help but think how everything turned. Therefore, I could say with utmost honest:

The Thirty-Seventh Season of “Saturday Night Live” was a Roller-Coaster Ride of Good Performances and Weak Efforts Made By the Show's Writers

When the thirty-seventh season of “Saturday night Live” started on September 24th, I actually thought the quality of the writing wasn't too bad. The season premier featured Guest Host Alec Baldwin; who was celebrating his sixteenth hosting stint; finally beating Steve Martin's total of fifteen. The show opened with a clever parody of the most recent Republican primary; which featured many of the castmembers, as well as Baldwin, impersonating the candidates. The monologue also featured an appearance of Martin; who, to comedic effect, wanted to make sure that Baldwin hadn't been using performance-enhancing drugs to aid in his many appearances on “Saturday Night Live.” The episode didn't feature a single reoccurring element; save for the reprisal of Baldwin's Tony Bennett impression; which he had displayed on previous hosting stints. Though the episode did teeter off in the second half, Baldwin's unfaltering performance helped keep the positive atmosphere of the show intact.

Then on October 1, 2011, Melissa McCarthy, who played the scene-stealing Megan in Kristen Wiig's hit comedy “Bridesmaids,” took the stage for her first time. Though much of the episode's writing wasn't above par, McCarthy eagerly went all-out to improve the quality of the sketches. From grinding-up against Castmember Jason Sudeikis to enthusiastically pouring salad dressing all over herself, Melissa McCarthy proved to be one of the season's top hosts.

Image of Featured Player Taran Killam, Host Melissa McCarthy and Castmember Abby Elliot taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=2011100110

As the first half of the season progressed, we got a mixed bag of episodes. On October 15th, Anna Faris, who was hosting the show for her second time, was saddled with sketches that strongly lacked clever writing. Though she remained upbeat throughout the night, Anna Faris didn't really contribute anything memorable to the show; other than joining Castmembers Kristen Wiig, Nasim Pedrad, and Abby Elliot in a sketch in which they portrayed 50's-era teenage girls who sang romantic advice to their depressed friend; played by Featured Player Vanessa Bayer. This episode would go on to be one of the season's earlier low-points. Another low point of the season took place on November 12th when Emma Stone, took the stage for her second time. Though she contributed a lot more to the show than Anna Faris, such as playing a ditzy pageant winner in the reoccurring game-show sketch “Secret Word” as well as portraying an ovel;y-awkward bridal shower guest in a sketch, Stone was allotted with writing that made the episode almost forgettable. The only truly memorable sketches were the opening debate sketch as well as a piece that featured Emma Stone and the castmembers portraying office workers who were crying and singing along to Adele's hit single “Someone Like You.” The whole segment was performed very well and went on to be one of the season's best music-related sketches. Nevertheless, the good performances of Emma Stone and the cast wasn't enough to save the show; thus resulting in a disappointing episode. But it was now where as unsatisfactory as the episode that aired on May 12th, 2012. But I'll get to that later.

Image of (taken from left to right) Castmember Fred Armisen, Emma Stone, Castmember Nasim Pedrad, Castmember Kristen Wiig, Castmember Andy Samberg, Castmember Kenan Thompson, Castmember Bill Hader, and Castmember Bobby Moynihan taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=2011111211

While Anna Faris' and Emma Stone's shows weren't entirely great, it was Katy Perry's hosting stint on December 10th that proved to be pretty bad. Most of the evening's sketches, Katy Perry was assigned a character that was required to sing at some point. While I do feel that Katy Perry has a very good voice, as well as a good stage presence, seeing as I've seen her perform on television a lot, it got to the point where all her appearances in sketches would be very predictable/ We all knew that she would be singing at some point; thus removing any unpredictability. And whenever Katy Perry was not singing;, her acting came off very awkward and she looked very uncomfortable on stage. Therefore, I could see why the writers gave her sketches that would require her to sing. Nevertheless, the episode was also marred by very lackluster writing and hardly any true comedy; save for an amusing segment on 'Weekend Update” which featured Alec Baldwin poking fun at himself for being kicked off an American Airlines flight for not turning off his cell phone. Seeing Baldwin thinly impersonating the pilot, who was meant to be offering a bladed apology, was a great way to address the incident as well as the best part of the whole episode.

While the first half of the season experienced a few bumps, there were some shows that proved to be quite enjoyable. For instance, on November 19th, First-time host Jason Segel was allotted sketches that, while not entirely well-written, ultimately proved to be amusing nonetheless. One segment concerned

a retirement party; during which the secretary, played by Kristen Wiig, who kept claiming that she had nothing to say towards her departing boss;played by Castmember Fred Armisen. In addition, Segel played a drunk employer who intended to reveal dark company secrets; only to find out that everyone was already aware of what he knew. While the writing was very repetitious, the performances of both Kristen Wiig and Jason Segel were so comically over-the-top, I couldn't help myself but to laugh. In addition, a piece detailing Kelly Ripa, played by Nasim Pedrad, auditioning potential co-hosts, while not entirely original, was so rich in great celebrity impressions, such as Featured Player Jay Pharaoh's dead-on and easygoing portrayal of Denzel Washington and Jason Segel's depiction of a very flirtatious Antonio Banderas, that it proved to be very amusing and worthwhile. Furthermore, Jason Segel shared an entertaining musical monologue with the Muppets; who became discontented after finding out they weren't hosting the episode. The only low-point of the episode proved to be a sketch that featured the return of the Vogelcheks; a family that kisses each other excessively. The sketch always follows the same format whenever it takes place; thus making the whole segment very predictable. Not even a surprise appearance by Paul Rudd, who starred in the first incarnation of the sketch in November 2008, could improve the segment. Nevertheless, the episode proved to be not-so-great

too bad; thanks in large to Jason Segel's engaging performance as the host.

Image of Jason Segel as Antonio Banderas taken from http://snl.jt.org/imp.php?i=3112

In addition, on December 3, 2011, Steve Buscemi took the stage for his second time: his first being on April 4th, 1998. Throughout the show, Buscemi's acting skills helped elevate the quality of some of the weaker sketches; one of which centered abound one of Kristen Wiig's reoccurring character. This particular on-screen persona of Wiig's, an overly-excited employee named "Sue", grew more excited over a co-worker's surprise promotion as the sketch went on. While Wiig gave an amusing performance, the sketch suffered to the fact that the format followed the exact same format as every other instance in which the character appears. Nevertheless, in addition to Wiig's performance, Steve Buscemi enabled the sketch further due to his ability to hold his ground and portray a very good straightman. In addition, Buscem's overall performance as host was very memorable; as his comic delivery meshed well with the acting of the cast. Furthermore, we got a couple of segments in which Steve Buscemi got to play a well-developed character; such examples included a coach that was being suspected of conducting inappropriate behavior towards high school students-- even though there was no evidence that proved such a thing. Henceforth, just as we have seen with Alec Baldwin, Melissa McCarthy, and Jason Segel, Steve Buscemi went on as being a host whose acting and comic skills was enough to vastly improve the quality of the sketches of a given show.

However on December 17th, “Saturday Night Live” had it's best episode of the season. For the Christmas episode, current “Late Night” host and Former Castmember Jimmy Fallon finally returned to host the show. Nearly every sketch this particular episode consisted of intriguing writing, first-class performances, and genuine humor. Fallon treated us to a rousing musical monologue that successfully combined celebrating the holidays with his returning to host “Saturday Night Live” for the first time. We were also treated to some very creative sketches; such as Fallon portraying Ludwig Van Beethoven introducing the members of his orchestra- as well as a segment in which theatergoers were presented to an unconventional staging of the well-known play “War Horse.” We even got to see surprise appearances by Jimmy Fallon’s fellow alumni Rachel Dratch, Horatio Sanz, Chris Kattan, Tracy Morgan, Amy Poehler, and Tina fey; the latter two joining “Weekend Update” Anchor Seth Meyers and Former Comedy Joke-Newscaster Fallon for an exciting and humorous “Weekend Update Joke-Off.” But, most importantly, throughout the show, Jimmy Fallon’s comedic talents and genuine zest shined brightly in every sketch even during a weakly-written sketch that he and Kristen Wiig were able to save thanks to their great performances. In other words, Jimmy Fallon's episode proved to be the season's best!

Image of Jimmy Fallon, Castmember Andy Samberg, and Featured Player Vanessa Bayer taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=201112172

Unfortunately, when “Saturday Night Live” returned from its winter hiatus on January 7th, 2012, my positive feelings for the remainder of the season began to dwindle. The first three shows of 2012, which were hosted by Charles Barkley, “Harry Potter” star Daniel Radcliffe, and Channing Tatum respectfully , weren’t up to par with Jimmy Fallon's amazing episode. Unlike Fallon, Charles Barkley and Channing Tatum hardly contributed anything special to their respective shows. Barkley, for instance, was only able to pull off a somewhat amusing impression of Shaquille O'Neal during a spoof of “Inside the NBA.” Every other time he appeared in a sketch, his performance came off awkward; and most of the time you could hardly understand a word he was saying. And on February 4, Channing Tatum appeared stiff in nearly every sketch; as he didn't possess any good chemistry with the cast. Fortunately, Daniel Radcliffe proved to be the best host out of the three; as, during the show on January 14, he proved to be up to anything-- including a segment in which he portrayed an adult version of Harry Potter that was still hanging around Hogwarts Academy a decade after graduating. The sketch was very creative and it allowed the castmembers opportunities to hilariously portray characters from the popular franchise. Nevertheless, this was the only truly great sketch in the episode; but Radcliffe's spirited performance throughout the night salvaged the tone of the show.

Then, on February 11th, 2012, something great happened: we actually got another decent episode. “New Girl” host Zooey Deschanel was taking the stage for her first time; and nearly every sketch was good. We got treated to an entertaining parody of “Piers Morgan Tonight;” that starred Featured Player Taran Killam as the respective host. Killam demonstrated a keen-but-exaggerated impression of Morgan; as he lead a discussion about MIA's middle-finger salute during the 2012 Superbowl Halftime show. The episode also featured an installment of the popular reoccurring segment “Les Junes de Paris;” only this time, the entire segment proved to be an homage to the Award-Winning film “The Artist;” complete with a surprise appearance by star Jean Dujardin. However, the best part of the episode was a series of commercial spoofs of Clint Eastwood's Superbowl spots for Chrysler. In every spot, Clint Eastwood, hilariously portrayed by Castmember Bill Hader, g roweled at Americans for being lazy and losing jobs to Mexico and China. The was also featured the humorous visual joke of the pants of Hader's representation of Clint Eastwood getting higher and higher during each advertisement-spoof. These segments proved to be the funnies aspect of the night; even though almost the whole show was amusing and enjoyable. The only sketch that wasn't very funny was a piece in which two southern party hosts, played by Zooey Deschanel and Kristen Wiig, who kept promising their guests that they were being served the greatest crabs ever. Only at the end of the sketch, it was revealed they forgot to provide the said meal. Though the joke of the sketch grew old and the ending was slightly predictable, the performances of Deschanel and Wiig were enough to make me laugh. Still, the episode proved to be enjoyable; and probably one of the better episodes of the second half of the 2011-2012 season.

Image of Castmember Bill Hader as Clint Eastwood taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=201202113

That being said, in the weeks that followed, a good number of the shows proved to be very weak and devoid of plenty of genuine comedy. In the month of March alone, we got burdened with a mostly dull episode hosted by Lindsay Lohan, who returned to the show for her fourth time on March 3, 2012. For her show, Lohan starred in a good number of sketches that were either constantly using the same joke over and over or possessing no genuine jokes whatsoever. One such piece, entitled “Delinquent Teen Girl Gang,” featured the reoccurring gag of one the girls, played by Fred Armisen in drag, repeatedly getting hit by a passing car. The joke got very old almost instantly; and Armisen just appeared annoying throughout the sketch. In addition, sketch that centered around two morning DJs, played by  Castmember Bobby Moynihan and Taran Killam, didn't posses many bright spots; apart from the performers' enthusiastic recitals. The only sketch that proved to be amusing was a parody of “Real Housewives of New Jersey;”-- entitled “Real Housewives of Disney.” In the filmed commercial spoof, Lindsay Lohan and the female castmembers portrayed spoiled versions of Disney princesses; such as Snow White and Belle from “Beauty and the Beast.” The entire sketch was very funny; but Kristen Wiig stole the sketch when portraying an ill-natured version of Cinderella. However, it should be said that Lindsay Lohan did not contribute anything special when playing Rapunzel; as see unenthusiastically spoke her lines throughout the piece. In fact, it could honestly be said that Lohan hardly contributed anything special during the episode; save for playing herself in a new installment of Castmember Kenan Thompson's somehow-reoccurring “Scared Straight”” sketch; during which, she got to make fun of her past illegal activities; such as stealing a necklace from a jewelery store. With the exception of poking fun at herself, I did not find the sketch hilarious; and it could be said that Lohan hardly seemed to be excited about appearing on the show; due to her listless delivery in the sketches.

The episode to air on March 10th also proved to be not so great. Jonah Hill hosted for his second time.  Though he was enthusiastic when hosting, the evening's sketches mostly consisted of reoccurring sketches pieces in which the same joke is once again repeated ad nausea; such as the evening's digital short-- that centered upon the joke of getting hit in a sensitive area on the body by tennis balls. In addition, in one sketch that could go down as possibly being one of the worst pieces of the season, Jonah hill played a scientist that proudly presented to various scientists a monkey named Brutus, played by Fed Armisen, that he taught how to speak English. However, when the creature spoke, he revealed that two frequently engage in sexual activity. From then on, all the scientists in attendance, played by members of the “Saturday Night Live” cast, were interested in this piece of information and nothing else. The sex jokes not only grew old fast, but the sheer stupidity of the piece was truly sickening. This sketch made me realize just how low the writers of the show will stoop in their effort to fill time. Fortunately, however, the show closed with a sketch that made me smile. Jonah Hill played a husband that was surprising his wife, played by Kristen Wiig, to the surprise sight of an orchestra, played by the show's male castmembers, on their anniversary. Initially touched, Wiig's character became shocked when the musicians dived into a performance of a song by the rapper Coolio. Jonah Hill proceeded to sing the lyrics while three women, played by castmembers Abby Elliott, Nasim Pedrad, and Vanessa Bayer, kept dancing around him. Both Jonah Hill and Kristen Wiig gave strong performances; as they each had many good lines that pertained to the significance of the song. The sketch ended with Kristen Wiig's character singing along with Hill's on-screen persona; leading to a real surprise: all the performers danced off the stage and into the audience! It's not often “Saturday Night Live” breaks the fourth wall like this; and it's a lot of fun to see the audience getting to see their favorite performers up-close. I hope the show does more endings like this; as it gives more life to a sketch. All in all, a very strong way to end an otherwise very weak episode.

In the month of April, "Saturday Night Live" aired two episodes; one of which was very weak; while other was much better.  On April 14th, Josh Brolin hosted the show for his second time; and once again, we didn't get a single great sketch. Throughout the show, Brolin didn't truly offer anything special as the host; particularly due to the fact that the writers didn't assign him major parts in the sketches. Most of the time, Brolin played a supporting character that either didn't get anything funny to say or even anything unique to offer to the audience. The evening's sketches were very disappointing; particularly one that was meant to be a spoof of soap operas that take place at the beach. The segment, entitled “The Californians,” featured Brolin and the castmembers portraying overly-clueless California residents that just spoke garbled sentences and behaved in an inane manner. The performances started out alright, but as the sketch went on, everyone just came off as being annoying. It appeared as if the writers were just using the voices of Brolin and the cast as the basis of the segment's humor; which ultimately proved to be very lazy. The only truly good portion of the show was a digital short in which Castmember Andy Samberg and Taran Killam kept “treating” Musical Guest Gotye to their imitation of the music video for his hit single “Somebody That I Used To Know.” The segment featured hilarious performances by Samberg and Killam; and I liked seeing Gotye involved with the show; in addition to just performing. Simply put, this was the funniest component of the show.



Image of (from left to right) Castmember Andy Samberg, Musical Guest Gotye, and Featured Player Taran Killam taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=2012041411

However, the previous week's episode (April 7th),  which was hosted by “Modern Family” star Sofia Vargara, proved to be much better.   Throughout her episode, Sofia Vergara gave a passionate performance that proved she was very excited about being the show's host. And though some of the evening's sketches were reoccurring pieces, among which was the return of Kristen Wiig's popular trouble-making character “Gilly,” as well as “The Manuel Ortiz Show:” which features Fred Armisen's emcee and all of his guests dancing throughout the program, Vergara had great chemistry with the cast and shined in every sketch. There was even an original segment that featured the actress filming a Pantene commercial with an overly-passionate Penelope Cruz; played by Featured Performer Kate McKinnon. Throughout the sketch, McKinnon's Penelope Cruz was saddled with words that she was unable to speak clearly; due to her thick accent. McKinnon gave a very strong performance throughout the piece and she worked very well with Vergara; who almost looked like she was going to start laughing at some point. The show wasn't bad; and it happened to be a good show to close out the month of April.

Image of Featured Player Kate McKinnon as Penelope Cruz and Host Sofia Vergara taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=2012040714

However, as the month of May came around, the overall writing of “Saturday Night Live” took a serious dive. Particularly on May 12th, when Former “Saturday Night Live” Castmember Will Ferrell assigned sketches in which he played a supporting character with limited screen-time. One such example was a piece called “Broadway Sizzle,” that featured Bill Hader and Kristen Wiig as Broadway veterans who were auditioning new talent. Ferrell played one of the singers; who kept mistakenly crooning songs that were originally meant to be performed by women. Though Ferrell gave it his all, the overall writing of the sketch didn't allow him to do much. Furthermore, the only two official sketches that Ferrell got to star in were a reprisal of middle school music teachers Marty and Bobbi-Mohan Culp, for which he teamed with Fellow Former Castmember Ana Gasteyer; as well as a C-Span sketch entitled “The 2012 Funkytown Debates”- which featured him and Kenan Thompson playing 70's-era characters that were outlining their political views and goals in a manner reflective of the time period. Though Ferrell and Gasteyer got the opportunity to bestow comedic performances, it was during this segment that Ferrell got allotted material that wasn't at all funny. I did enjoy seeing Ferrell once again exhibited his impression of Former President George W. Bush during the show's cold opening, which he got to work alongside Jason Sudeikis' comical portrayal of Vice President Joe Biden, but alas, the show proved to be very disappointing. Even the show's digital short, which happened to be The Lonely Island's 100th Filmed Piece (which featured clever cameos from past gusts like Natalie Portman and Michael Bolton), wasn't enough to save the show. Simply put, we got an unmemorable episode that didn't allow Will Ferrell many opportunities to demonstrate his bona fide comedy talents. And this, my friends, was the season's most disappointing episode.

Image of Castmember Jason Sudeikis as Vice President Joe Biden and Will Ferrell as Former President George W. Bush taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=201205121

Then on May 19th, the season came to end with Rock and Roll legend Mick Jagger serving as both the host and musical guest. Throughout the show, Jagger performed very well; whether whether he was in a sketch or performing with special guest musicians Arcade Fire, The Foo Fighters, and Jeff Beck. Jagger possessed very good comedic timing and a great stage performance that helped improve the quality of the sketches. One such sketch that was greatly improved by his performance was set in a karaoke bar; where Jagger played an uptight businessman whose co-workers were performing songs that were originally done by The Rolling Stones; the rock band for which he is the lead singer in real life. His co-workers kept encouraging him to perform; but Jagger's on-screen persona kept claiming that he's too nervous to sing in front of people. The whole joke of the sketch was that Mick Jagger was poking fun at himself by playing a character that isn't used too performing; when, in real life, he is a famous musician that tours across the country. While I was happy with Mick Jagger's performance,the concept of a famous musician or athlete playing a character that can't either sing or play a specific sport, has been done numerous times before on the long-running sketch comedy program. Nevertheless, Jagger was a great host and went on to treat the audience to three wonderful musical feats; the best being his performances of “19th Nervous Breakdown” and “It's Only Rock 'n' Roll” with The Foo Fighters. Simply put, Mick Jagger was a great host to close out the season.

Image of (from left to right) Castmember Fred Armisen, Castmember Kristen Wiig, Featured Player Vanessa Bayer, and Host Mick Jagger taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=201205194

It should also be mentioned that the episode served as the final episode for Kristen Wiig; who served seven memorable seasons as a castmember on the program. The show began with “The Lawrence Welk Show,” the reoccurring spoof of the classic variety series, that once again featured Kristen Wiig's tiny-handed dancer "Dooneese"; who was obviously appearing for the last time. The sketch also featured a surprise appearance by her “Bridesmaids” co-star and three-time “Saturday Night Live” host Jon Hamm; who was playing an Italian singer that eventually fells in love with Wiig's character. It was nice to see Jon Hamm on stage with Kristen Wiig one last time; as they possess great comedic chemistry. The episode also featured one last installment of the popular game show sketch “Secret Word;” during which Kristen Wiig once again played the overacting theater veteran Mindy Gracin; who continuously blurted out the answers to the questions to her designated teammate. Even though the sketch basically follows the same format every time, I always enjoy Kristen Wiig's performances as this character. It would have been nice to have seen Kristen Wiig pull out her Kathy Lee Gifford impression one last time; but this was fine.

Image of Jon Hamm and Kristen Wiig taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=201205191

The final sketch of the night proved to not only be enjoyable; but also a great closing to the season. The cast of “Saturday Night Live” portrayed members of the graduating class of 2012; and Mick Jagger, who was serving as the commencement speaker, calls up Kristen Wiig; who was ending her seven-year tenure (obviously indicating that she was leaving the show). The graduating setting faded and Arcade Fire started performing the classic Rolling Stones song “She's a Rainbow” as Wiig engaged in farewell dances with Jagger, her fellow cast members, and the show's Executive Producer Lorne Michaels. Finally, Arcade Fire began playing the Rolling Stones' song “Ruby Tuesday” and the stage filled with the likes of The Foo Fighters, Jeff Beck, Jon Hamm, Steve Martin (who made a surprise appearance in another installment of “The Californians” that aired in the second half of the show), as well as Former Castmembers Chris Parnell, Chris Kattan, Amy Poehler, Rachael Dratch, and Will Forte. Simply put, it was a truly sweet way to say goodbye to Kristen Wiig as well as an unforgettable way to end a season filled with many hits and misses.

Image of Kristen Wiig's Farewell Sketch taken from http://snl.jt.org/detail.php?i=2012051913

It should also be mentioned that this episode ultimately served as Andy Samberg's final episode as a castmember; as he recently revealed that he will be leaving after seven years on the show. It was strongly hinted that May 19 was his final date on the show; considering that the evening's digital short was a sequel to his breakout video “Lazy Sunday:' that premiered in December 2005. It was nice to see Samberg reteam with Chris Parnell for a second rap; even though it wasn't as clever as the original. Nevertheless< “Saturday Night Live” is going to be very different without Andy Samberg; seeing as the digital shorts helped expose the program to younger viewers. With Samberg gone, I wonder if there will still be short films interspersed throughout the upcoming season; as they were a nice addition to the legacy of “Saturday Night Live.” I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

When contemplating the season as a whole, I have to honestly say it wasn't all bad. Tyre, we got many badly-written sketches throughout the year, but nevertheless, we have gotten at least one or two good segments in every episode. And that has to count for something. Unfortunately, however, that doesn't help the fact that the future of “Saturday Night Live” is in heavy question. With the departure of Kristen Wiig, the women of “Saturday Night Live” (Abby Elliot, Nasim Pedrad, Vanessa Bayer, and Kate McKinnon) have to step up to the plate and give their best performances in every episode of Season Thirty-Eight. Kristen Wiig truly was a comic powerhouse and her absence is going to be felt heavily. They need to be able to keep audiences laughing as much as Kristen Wiig does. Otherwise, I don;t know what will happen.

In addition, I greatly hope that Head Writer Seth Meyers, who also serves as the host of “Weekend Update,” gets more heavily focused on making sure quality sketches make it to the broadcast. This year saw an abundance in rehashed sketches as well as original pieces that unfortunately feature the same jokes over and over again. It seems to me that Meyers just says “yes” to every sketch he is given by the show's writers; and that is not good. He, as well as the show's production staff, seem to be focused on getting as many sketches on air as possible in an attempt to fill time, It's always important to remember that quality is always more important than quantity. I would rather have a small amount of cleverly-written and performed sketches rather than an assortment of sketches that are rushed, overly-juvenile, or rehashed. If each episode can feature sketches that are both original and hilarious, than I'm sure the season would be a complete success. I just wish the writers would be up to doing so; rather than just churning out poorly-written material on a regular basis while eagerly awaiting their weekly pay check. Suffice to say, they better get their act together for the upcoming election year.

All in all, Season Thirty-Seven of “Saturday Night Live” has definitely been, while not entirely terrible, very weak. Hopefully, everyone uses the summer of 2012 to rest properly as the 2012-2013 season approaches. That way, when the show returns in September 2012, everyone will be ready to make America laugh Saturday nights at 11:30pm. It's live entertainment. And I couldn't ask for anything else.... except for clever writing!

E-mail me at thatsnatertainment@gmx.com